Talk:Dokumacılar

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Dokumacılar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160201223028/http://www.medya365.com/guncel/dokumacilar-grubu-nedir-h302951.html to http://www.medya365.com/guncel/dokumacilar-grubu-nedir-h302951.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dokumacılar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150723162625/http://www.taraf.com.tr/guncel-haber/canli-bombalar-dokumaci-cikti-tam-60-kisiler-iste-isidin-dokumacilar-grubu/ to http://www.taraf.com.tr/guncel-haber/canli-bombalar-dokumaci-cikti-tam-60-kisiler-iste-isidin-dokumacilar-grubu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Notability
While this is certainly a good-faith effort. This article fails on the grounds of WP:Notability. There is not enough evidence that this unit existed at all. There is evidence that people from the province mentioned were involved. As for the numbers 60-70 would be troubling enough. Then we have the alledged unit and alleged attacks. So there is no firm proof of either. My recommendation is to delete the article. Tirronan (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)