Talk:Dolce Vito – Dream Restaurant

Requested move 1

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved Legoktm (talk) 00:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Dolce Vito – Dream Restaurant → Vito Cataffo – Article appears to be a biography about the person who happened to be in a documentary of this title.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 18:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete this article was kept at AfD on condition it be converted into a TV show article, which didn't happen. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 23:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I think you'll need to re-list that at AfD for that to happen.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 08:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll see what the closing admin thinks. --BDD (talk) 17:14, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Bleaney (talk) 18:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * This is not a deletion discussion. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Oppose. The AfD was closed with the conclusion that the man is non-notable, but the show is, and that therefore the article would be renamed and rescoped to be about the show. Nobody has yet performed the rescoping, but the finding remains and it should be done; renaming to the man would be the equivilant of recreating the article in contravention of the AfD, and the fact that no work has been done is not a reason to seek to delete it. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:REDLINK, the topic is notable, but no article exists on the topic, therefore, this should become a redlink, to allow someone to create a new article on the subject. The current article is not about the topic WP:COATRACK ; So, there should be no redirect here, and the current content does not match the ostensible topic. So, it should be deleted with no prejudice on recreating it (ie. recreation of an article at this title would not be speedy deletion eligible) ; Can someone open a DRV on this? -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 07:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The Bushranger's text seems to make the position clear enough. This isn't the forum for a deletion discussion though. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 23:13, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.