Talk:Dollar General

Untitled
What is the "Wal-mart effect"? RedWolf 04:13, Nov 23, 2003 (UTC)


 * The statement of Dollar General having top-notch merchandise at low prices seems non-neutral. If that was a quote from the website, it is OK, but this seems a bit leaning towards Dollar General.--Tim Quievryn 19:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Public Stock
If anyone knows what the public ticker symbol was before being purchased, please include it in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.243.78.142 (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC) DG was their stock ticker symbol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.131.152.32 (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

POV-check
The entire Concepts section sounds like it was written by the DG marketing department. I removed the more egregious NPOV violations, but more checking is needed.--TexasDex 14:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Have you ever shop there? There is some really nice stuff and often near or better then old walmart prices.
 * I worked there for over a year, and while I don't disagree that they have some good and cheap products Wikipedia has certain standards for neutrality, including neutral tone and not presenting points of view or opinions as fact. Looking at it again, I think the "Concepts" section most definitely violates those principles.  Whoever rewrites this (it might be me if I ever have any free time) will have to reword and trim that section in particular to ensure neutrality. --TexasDex 08:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

infobox?
no corporate info box, i will work on adding one.Paco8191 23:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I added a full info box, and i dont think this reads like an advertisment, at least not that much.Paco8191 01:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

on second thought, i really don't to - sorry

Picture
The first picture looked like a retailer converted to DG, and the second one looks like a CGI pic from a pamphlet. I've replaced it with a picture I took myself of the new DG store in my hometown — I would think it'd be best if the picture shows a "default" store design. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Company Motto-DG is actively Christian?
Just curious what the history is behind the DG motto "Jesus Loves You"? Why is this company actively supporting a religion? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.183.84.89 (talk) 02:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

I worked at its headquarters from October 2017 to November 2018. During that time, I didn't observe any active company support of any religion or proof of former support for any religion, but I did observe active internal support of a few anti-Christian causes. Please regard these statements as original research and take heed of my WP:COI notice at the top of this page. -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 03:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Dollar General. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107040228/http://www.dollargeneral.com// to http://www.dollargeneral.com/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107040228/http://www.dollargeneral.com// to http://www.dollargeneral.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dollar General. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140324065731/http://www.kylebuschmotorsports.com/news/entry.php?nid=1059 to http://www.kylebuschmotorsports.com/news/entry.php?nid=1059

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * DGJLTurner1939.jpg (discussion)
 * DollarGeneral1955.jpg (discussion)

Conflicting statements
"As of July 2018, Dollar General operates 15,000 stores[4][1] in the 48 contiguous United States." "Areas served	Contiguous United States (except for the Northwest)" There are no Dollar General stores in Washington state, therefore they do not operate stores in the 48 contiguous United States. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:4800:2C88:D11:3143:F0C3:2675 (talk) 14:31, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

North Dakota
Hi, I made an edit in "Dollar General" on Wikipedia. I am in North Dakota. First time, I went to DG in Steele, ND in August 2019. DG, the same Mini-Walmart. I drove through and across North Dakota. I suddenly saw these DG stores in Steele, Elgin, Hazen, Beulah, Grafton, Cavalier, Langdon, Gwinner, Belfield, Richardton, Edgeley, Ellendale, Bowman, Valley City, West Fargo, Lakota, 2 Minot, Underwood and Center. Multiple DG Stores in multiple very small towns in all over North Dakota. Counted 42 DG Stores in North Dakota. --Rossdegenstein (talk) 10:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

To include or not to include mass shooting at Dollar General Jacksonville location
A reference to the mass shooting at a Dollar General in Jacksonville earlier this month had previously been added to the 2003-present history section of the article by @SuperbowserX, which was later removed by @Counterfeit Purses. References to mass shootings that have occurred in chains have been included and not included in their articles for different reasons.

For example, in 2022 there was a mass shooting at a Tops Supermarket in Buffalo, New York, and while a mention of the shooting was originally added to the article, it was later decided that it should be removed due to the fact that it did not effect the business as a whole, and just impacted one location.

On the other hand, when there was a mass shooting at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, it was decided that a reference to the shooting should be kept due to the fact that shooting impacted the way that the company would conduct its business, such as changing its policy in relation to the sale of firearms.

While it is also true that with other mass shootings that had occurred at businesses, such as the most recent other example with the Cook's Corner article mentioning the mass shooting that occurred there earlier this month despite no clear overarching impact to business, these locations are not chains, so the impact to the business is much more clear in that sense.

For this reason, and to avoid any possible edit warring I have brought this up here. Personally, in accordance to how the shootings were handled in regard to the Tops and Walmart articles, I am in favor of not including a reference to the shooting unless something significant changes as a result of this shooting in the business. RaskBunzzz (talk) 09:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I thought the same thing. I remember the Talk:Tops_Friendly_Markets topic. Waffle House article don't mention the incidents anymore. Cwater1 (talk) 04:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

"General Dollar" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=General_Dollar&redirect=no General Dollar] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Controversies NPOV
"Perpetuating economic distress" in the controversies section seems to be quoting some opinions, but without saying the source. This sounds like it's being presented as fact. 172.58.139.158 (talk) 19:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)