Talk:Domenico Puligo

Untitled
Bibliography

Irenez2017 (talk) 15:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Irenez2017

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Irenez2017. Peer reviewers: Hannahhwolfe.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
It seems like you have found some great sources. You have a strong start with your research, but need to add some structure and information to your article. It would be helpful if you created a lead section and then perhaps personal life, career/artistic significance, and lasting influence/significance.

I copyedited a few minor grammatical things (it is often important with these sorts of articles to clarify pronouns so that there is no ambiguity), but did not make any major changes.

It would be helpful if you could find more information on his relationships with other artists (which you touch on) and biographical history. It would also clarify the article if you added a bit about his style, use of materials, and artistic development.

In general, your sources show a good start, and I look forward to reading a more developed article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahhwolfe (talk • contribs) 23:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Response to Peer Review
Thank you Hannahhwolfe for your comments and suggestions, I really appreciate them and have taken them into consideration as I improve upon my article.

I had been working on my article in my Sandbox but have now moved it on to the main page of the article. As you have suggested, I have included a lead section, a life section, and two other sections on his work.

I have elaborated upon what is known about his relationships with other artists and also tentatively added information on his style and progression as an artist. I definitely agree that these aspects served to clarify the article more.

Thank you also for making those small changes! Often small mistakes like that can be more recognizable by another set of eyes, I really appreciate it!

Irenez2017 (talk) 19:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Irenez2017