Talk:Dominic Tweddle

Notability
Does he meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG? Boleyn (talk) 15:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review of the page Dominic Tweddle . I've added categories and removed the request for inline citations; I'm not sure why the latter was there, since inline citation were already used throughout. Regarding notability, I think he meets the WP:PROF guidelines in three ways:
 * 1) Research with a significant impact: He is the main person responsible for the research on the Coppergate helmet, and in doing so published the most comprehensive typology of Anglo-Saxon and Viking helmets (Tweddle 1992)
 * 2) Prestigious scholarly society: He's a fellow of both the Society of Antiquaries of London and the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland
 * 3) Appointed post: He's the Director General of the National Museum of the Royal Navy
 * I've expanded coverage of the first in the article. Please let me know if that addresses all the issues! Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 16:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to explain that to me,. I'll remove the notability tag. My only remaining concern is the 'Bibliography' section - is it suggested further reading or sources that should be inlnie? Thanks again for your hard work on this, Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks again for your work and input, . I'm not sure what exactly the difference is between 'Bibliography' and 'Further reading' sections; to bridge the difference I've added citations to ensure that each source supports a particular part of the page. Hope that works! Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 00:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)