Talk:Dominion of Melchizedek/Archive 4

Notice
'''NOTE: this page has been the victim of officially recognized prolonged Sock-Puppetry. Please keep this in mind when reading or commenting on this talk-page.'''

No Reliable Sources, dead links, and multiple BLP Violations
Almost this entire article is unsourced or uses non reliable sources. It repeatedly accuses living persons of fraud. When I tried editing out all of the sentences that had no reliable source, there is almost nothing left in the article. Does anyone object to my removing the unsourced material? HkFnsNGA (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Dear Mr. Pedley, probably we need another round of sock-puppetry investigation first. Article is well sourced and "accused" persons were convicted by court for frauds.--Yopie (talk) 02:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Dallas Observer is a fake newspaper? Non reliable source and BLP violations all over
I went to the Dallas Observer link which seemed to be the best chance of being at least a minimally reliable source. It appears to be a fake internet newspaper used to try to elect a hairdresser, Farouk Shami, to be governor of Texas. Much of this entire Dominion of Melchizedek article appears to be a hoax or a deliberate joke. HkFnsNGA (talk) 00:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Meatpuppets
Just a reminder...

Dominion of Melchizedek and associated articles, shall be semi-protected. If necessary,, or any other editor believed by an administrator to be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of Johnski, may be blocked indefinitely by any administrator. The article may be unprotected (and reprotected) at the discretion of any admin who deems it safe to do so. Requests_for_arbitration/Johnski/Proposed_decisionDavidpdx (talk) 03:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Melchizedek Bible
I noticed that there is mention of the Melchizedek Bible on this article about DoM but links to site doesn't have that "bible" and when trying to fix that link a bot removed it maybe cause of the prior inclusion of a twitter account; http://www.melchizedek.com/mz_bible/mb_intro.htm

I also noticed that this is a fake link;

but it was before the fake link installed this;

I checked if there was a twitter account for DoM using Google and found one but the bot removed that too: www.twitter.com/kingofsalem —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.91.199 (talk) 23:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

A little generous?

 * After CBS aired the program, DoM demanded a retraction of statements made during the program. As a result of the bad press, DoM filed a lawsuit (in their own judicial system) on 2000-05-09 seeking damages for libel against CBS in the amount of $1 billion. The lawsuit named Klein, Simon, and CBS as the defendants. On 2000-07-25, DoM entered a default judgement against CBS, claiming that the company failed to respond to the lawsuit. Because of the lack of jurisdiction of the lawsuit, CBS has refused to acknowledge the judgement.[13]

Isn't this a little generous? I think WP:NPOV would classify the concept that the DoM has a judicial system as a minority viewpoint. Nor did CBS refuse to acknowledge the judgement because of a lack of jurisdiction; it refused to acknowledge the existence of the legal system at all. Certainly the DoM press release is a lousy source to cite for CBS's reasons.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Pearlasia Gamboa
Why is there so little information here on Pearlasia Gamboa? 64.134.239.60 (talk) 01:24, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * There's info on her at the SEC in San Fan fed court. Apparantly her two sons helped her swindle a guy out of a few hundred thou related to BankAsia. Looks like a crime dynasty in formation. They say the oldest son's a lawyer somewhere. PPdd (talk) 02:29, 26 March 2011 (UTC)