Talk:Domino effect accident

Good job!
Great article! Thanks for sharing!

--Kimzhwx (talk) 14:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Very interesting!
I found your article very interesting, also nicely structured and explained. I just corrected a few minor spelling and grammar mistakes. Nice job! --Nora Sistemich (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Informative article
Well researched article, good amount of information. I corrected some minor phrases and added some links to Wikipedia articles. Perhaps in "characteristics of domino effect accidents", it'd be nice to have some graphs or pictures to show how domino effect accident progresses with time? --Glama1 (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Observations and suggestions for improvements
The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Tecnology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2020.

The first two paragraphs are substantially the repetition of the same content, try to rationalize them avoiding so many repetition. There are some English mistakes, in particular the use of ""the"", revise. ""For example, an earthquake may lead to multiple failures of hazardous installations in chemical industrial areas and induce the damage of other critical infrastructures, making the prevention of domino effect accidents more difficult than domino effects caused by accidental events."" These are the so called NaTech accidents, you could clarify a bit. ""Intentional and unintentional domino effect accidents"" this paragraph is not well written, there are the ideas but not the readability... The References turn around the same names, try to extend it to someone else.

Majorett (talk) 10:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)