Talk:Domitian II

Untitled
This entry is misleading. With so little evidence of existence, "emperor" and "rule" should be avoided or put into a clearer context. Maximus Rex 20:13, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I agree it is misleading to call Domitianus II an Emperor as he never controlled the city of Rome or a military force sufficiently powerful as to preserve his regime against rivals. He is more correctly categorised as a Roman usurper.Pjbjas (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)