Talk:Don't Start Now

Requested move 29 March 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved per consensus below. (non-admin closure) – Ammarpad (talk) 18:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

– WP:TWODABS. Unreal7 (talk) 15:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't Start Now (Dua Lipa song) → Don't Start Now
 * Don't Start Now → (deleted to make way for page move)


 * Support - Page views are fairly convincing, even for such a recent song. -- Netoholic @ 17:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Support - Dua Lipa's song is by far the more well known song. The DAB page is receiving 3 times more page views than the BoA song article.  Cool Marc  22:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Support - An obvious situation. Definitely, a primary topic judging by the views. — Tom (T2ME) 16:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Support - Mainstream and well known song at the moment. More popular than other "Don't Start Now". — LOVI33 (talk) 22:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Genre
One or two sources calling it pop and dance when at least 10 have called it Nu-disco is not BEST describing the song per Template:Infobox song. We don't list every genre under the sun, if the vast majority of reputable music sources are calling it a nu-disco song then we WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia. It makes no sense to have disco when the more specific nu-disco is already present. Please stop insisting on applying every genre you can think of to infoboxes of song articles.
 * Rolling Stone Lipa returned with “Don’t Start Now,” a nu-disco cut
 * Crack Magazine "the gold-plated, nu-disco kiss-off of Don't Start Now"
 * Slant Magazine "“Don't Start Now,” the nu-disco slower burner"
 * musicOMH Preceded by the Moloko-esque nu-disco treasure Don’t Start Now
 * PopMatters Premiering her snappy nu-disco single "Don't Start Now" at the 2019 MTV EMA's
 * E! Online "This wickedly groovy nu-disco kiss-off track
 * Billboard Was a nu-disco track really going to explode in the way that Lipa needed to reach a new level of stardom? In short: yes, albeit slowly.
 * MTV News the dazzling nu-disco "Don't Start Now,"
 * Forbes Led by nu-disco track 'Don’t Start Now
 * Glamour "pumping nu disco anthem"

 Cool Marc  07:57, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Hayley Williams cover
Hello everyone. I just wanted to make a note of the following edit as I believe the Hayley Williams cover is actually notable. The cover has been discussed in reliable, third-party sources like Rolling Stone, MTV News, and Consequence of Sound so a brief part on it in the article seems appropriate to me due to this type of coverage. Pinging since they are the primary editor of the article. Apologies for the randomness of the message. Just something I thought was worth discussing. Aoba47 (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , sorry I only saw your comment now. I honestly think it's trivial since artists are obliged to perform covers when they appear on Live Lounge. If it were a cover included on a studio album or along those lines I feel it would be worth including.  Cool Marc   ✉   16:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I disagree. Notability should be established through coverage, and this cover received coverage. I have never heard of a cover being considered notable or not if it was released on an album. But this is just my opinion. Aoba47 (talk) 20:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Article history template
Lovi33, see this, this, and this. Not sure why the peer review closer didn't switch it to the old peer review template, but a reminder to not remove the template, rather build it in to articlehistory. Just an FYI, Sandy Georgia (Talk)  17:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)