Talk:Don Black (baseball)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Big  Dom  09:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments

 * The lead is fine, a good summary of the article and the rest of the article is well-written and interesting.
 * Any chance of expanding on the "violation of team rules"? What did he actually do?
 * Are there definitely no images available? You might be able to have one under fair use seeing as he is deceased.

Criteria check

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Good amount of coverage without going too in-depth
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images, but this is not a reason to fail at GA
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just the one comment above, but it's not a problem as such, just a clarification. Happy to pass this as a GA.
 * No images, but this is not a reason to fail at GA
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just the one comment above, but it's not a problem as such, just a clarification. Happy to pass this as a GA.

Pass with congratulations. Big Dom  09:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) For the image, there's a couple really low-quality ones I've seen in the google news archives, it's either one of those or nothing, undecided on which is better. I'll expand on the violation of team rules if I can find more (and can probably expand the alcohol stuff a bit yet if I wanted to) Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 12:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)