Talk:Don Getty/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of August 9, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Written in a clear and understandable manner, good structural organization and flow.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout, to WP:RS/WP:V sources.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Covers multiple aspects of the individual's life in detail.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be worded in a neutral manner.
 * 5. Article stability? Article is stable, no conflict on the talk page, no conflict evident in edit history going back 2 months.
 * 6. Images?: No images present in the article. This is not a dealbreaker, and it does not violate WP:WIAGA to not have images, but at some point it would be nice to try to find some free-use images to add to the article.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 03:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)