Talk:Don Moen

Justification for my removal
I have removed the sentence:


 * "Don Moen's name is synonymous with praise and worship music, having written and recorded many worship favorites sung in the church today."

For the following reason:
 * synonymous means different words with similar or identical meanings and are interchangable. Clearly Moen's name is not "identical or similar" to "praise and worship music". I appreciate it is a turn of phrase, but an encyclopaedia deals in factual language, not opinions or implications.
 * "having written and recorded many worship favorites sung in the church today" is a meaningless phrase in global terms. What church? Which religion? This sentence must be more specific if it is to be included, as there is a world of churches outside the US bible belt where modern Christian music is popular in churches.

I'd appreciate it if the editor who is reverting this would justify their position here also. Thanks. Rockpocket (talk) 06:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I have now reverted the article 3 times - explaining why each time - and will not revert again. User:Park john u has done likewise, without any justification of explanation. Should this editor revert again they will be in breach of WP:3RR and may be liable for a block. I implore the editor to discuss their edits here, rather than simply re-inserting POV material into, what should be, a very non controversial bio. Thanks. Rockpocket (talk) 06:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

How old is he?
A good biography needs a birthdate... please add

Davidkazuhiro 17:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Major copyedit
Ok, so i have just spent an hour or so, copyediting, wikifying and categorising all of Moen's albums. I have also created a category for them (Category:Don Moen albums), moved them all to their most simple title when possible, added disambigs where appropriate and removed all double redirects (i hope). If any editor plans to make futher articles on Moen's albums, could they please use one of the current ones a a template. Thank you.  Rockpock e  t  08:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

what a load of crap
just saw him on youtube. what a load of old rubbish. Hi :) Alexandre8 (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Don Moen (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100116195245/http://donmoen.com/gen/pt.aspx?sn=1046&p1=1081 to http://www.donmoen.com/gen/pt.aspx?sn=1046&p1=1081

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 16 July 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved.  Event horizon51  (talk) 02:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Don Moen (singer) → Don Moen – A WP:TWODABS situation. This is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per |Don_Moen_(Canadian_football) page views. SST flyer  03:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Support This article's page views is two orders of magnitude higher (299 per day vs. 3 per day for the other). Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per Primary topic. ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀   19:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per PRIMARYTOPIC after review of Pageviews Analysis across the two pages. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.