Talk:Don Tallon with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'll be reviewing this shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Specific concerns
 * Not enough to not pass the article, but the long strings of citations are really ugly. Can't something be done about them?
 * As usual, jargon heavy. It'll get dinged at FAC. Yada, yada, yada, we've been here before ...
 * Neither of these are enough to keep the article from passing, so I'm passing it now. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)