Talk:Donald Duck: Goin' Quackers/Archive 1

Infected Demo
A while ago, I got a demo of this game from Kellogs Cereal, and Avast! said it was infected with Win32: Simile. Is this really the case, or is this just a false positive? Thanks for your help.

86.210.172.52 (talk) 18:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

What do you want me to do
how many alternative version of this game

Game Boy color, version we call all agree its very diffrent from the rest, Playstation N64 Game Cube Dreamcast Windows Playstation 2

What do you want me to do
Okay Prince, just tell me what exactly you want me to help with. Gears of War Go 'Skins! 13:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

New revisions
I'm not sure why the edits I made were reverted. The only explanation was "I don't like these revisions." All of my edits were aesthetic or information that has citable sources. I will revert back to my edits if I am not given proper reason. Bovineboy2008 (talk) 22:38, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, here's what's wrong with your edits:

That's it. The Prince (talk) 22:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You removed the spaces in the VG template, which made it all cramped and hard to read while editing
 * In genre, you changed platform to platform game. The genre is called platform, the article's called platform game since platform is an ambiguous term.
 * There's no point in changing "Windows" to "Microsoft Windows" and GameCube to Nintendo GameCube; they're perfectly acceptable abbreviations. It also makes it less cluttered.
 * Saying it's a platform game is sufficient. "Video game" is unnecessary since there's a link for platform game explaining it's a VG genre.
 * Donald Duck Advance is a game and needs to be in italics.
 * Scores should be written out without using the slash. It's can be misinterpreted like the game received two separate scores. I also don't like how you collapsed the table. I know it's a little long, but collapsing it has been brought up as an issue at numerous FACs, so ultimately, we should avoid it.
 * The DuckTales template is a part of the article and should be before the stub tags.
 * You removed the spaces in the VG template, which made it all cramped and hard to read while editing


 * I can agree with this, I was just trying to save space.
 * In genre, you changed platform to platform game. The genre is called platform, the article's called platform game since platform is an ambiguous term.
 * The same.
 * There's no point in changing "Windows" to "Microsoft Windows" and GameCube to Nintendo GameCube; they're perfectly acceptable abbreviations. It also makes it less cluttered.
 * These are the proper names of the systems; they should be listed as their full name some where in the article in my opinion.
 * Saying it's a platform game is sufficient. "Video game" is unnecessary since there's a link for platform game explaining it's a VG genre.
 * Since it is first and foremost a video game, I think there should be a link to video game some where in the lead paragraph.
 * Donald Duck Advance is a game and needs to be in italics.
 * I agree with that.
 * Scores should be written out without using the slash. It's can be misinterpreted like the game received two separate scores. I also don't like how you collapsed the table. I know it's a little long, but collapsing it has been brought up as an issue at numerous FACs, so ultimately, we should avoid it.
 * Just trying to save space.
 * The DuckTales template is a part of the article and should be before the stub tags.
 * I only do that so the stub tags can be seen before the giant block; I simply thought it would be clearer.


 * You did not address the deletion of the release dates for GBA, though. What about that? Bovineboy2008 (talk) 23:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That's an entirely different game and it's stated it was released in 2001 in its separate section. All the different release dates here are unnecessary since it was released the same year in all regions. The Prince (talk) 23:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, now why did you delete the USK rating and the OFLC rating? Bovineboy2008 (talk) 23:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If you can tell me where you found these ratings, they can be added back. The Prince (talk) 23:42, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Moby Games Bovineboy2008 (talk) 23:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Added it back. Now I have another concern: There shouldn't be an extra infobox. All relevant information should be in the section's prose, as the box crashes with the VG reviews box. Also, the image you uploaded has an extremely high resolution, and two cover arts in one article goes against WP:NFCC. Therefore, I'm going to have to remove it. The Prince (talk) 23:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Can someone tell me why there's no wiki link to the music album of the same title? Guest001 3/23/09 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.18.31 (talk) 04:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Alternative
how many alternative version of this game

Now the problem sets in we have it on the following:
 * Game Boy color,
 * Playstation
 * N64
 * Dreamcast
 * Windows
 * Game Cube
 * Playstation 2

Game Boy color, version we call all agree its very diffrent from the rest, no animated cutsequences etc. I would think that the PS1, is its one version, since number of lifes are displayd diffrently than N64 and Dreamcast, both have soft gold cirles around number of lifes but PS1 dont have any rings around it. But Dreamcast has better animation sequences than N64, so maybe its running on the same Ryan 2 engine although i havent found anything online to support that theory of mine. But the PS2 and gameCube not have bold gray ring around the number of lifes. In other words I think one reweiver is probably confusing GameCube with N64.

I would think I don't know where the windows version fits in i think it probably fits with n64, dreamcast but that would mostly depend on how the life count is designed. But I cannot find any footage online. 31.209.153.12 (talk) 00:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Game Boy Color
 * PS1
 * N64, Dreamcast
 * PS2 and GameCube