Talk:Donghai Bridge

Donghai Bridge
there is no need to merge articles written in 2 different languages, is there?

Agreed. If anything, all topics should have separate pages in different languages, shouldn't they? Oughgh 02:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Controversy?
It seems that some of fellow Wikipedians consider "Controversy" section on any large project almost mandatory. I don't think that one critical article in The Economist makes the project controversial. (I am not saying that the bridge project is not controversial - I haven't a clue - or that The Economist is wrong; I just think that some more opinions from "naysayers" would come handy in the section.) --bonzi (talk) 17:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Map
of the bridge's route is more or less accurate, but almost everything else on the map isn't: the Pudong shoreline and the islands themselves both need to be redone... — Llywelyn II   15:29, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Donghai Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060412135430/http://www.donghai-bridge.com.cn:80/ to http://www.donghai-bridge.com.cn
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060316061610/http://www.chinapage.com/bridge/shanghai/donghai/donghaibridge.html to http://www.chinapage.com/bridge/shanghai/donghai/donghaibridge.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)