Talk:Donor offspring

POV
This page doesn't seems to omit the POV of embryo, sperm, and ovo donors. Additionally, it advocates of POV with the word "should".Zeroend 03:36, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

This page also needs links to several other topics. I'll be glad to add them, but wanted guidance on the neutrality issue before proceeding. -Zeroend 03:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi there.. perhaps this page doesn't omit the POV of donors because this page is about donor conceived people. And i believe there are pages about sperm donors etc. What do you suggest as an alternative to the word "should" then?  I initially set up the page for "donor conceived people", which seems to have the links now and is a replica of this page. -Narelle_t5

The subject is about the offspring - not the adults involved - and so for that reason the following organisations on this page do not belong there: Donor Conception Support Group, UK Donorlink, Donor Conception Network, Infertily Network. Who were they kidding thinking about it? (no apologies for the inadvertent pun) message posted by lulu 14th November 2006 AOL email address - UserMa7346


 * There are no specific pages for the other parties involved though. I would rather see a general article on gamete donation that covers all these views rather than a separate one like this. The problem is we have them separated into sperm donation and egg donation. Would gamete donation be warranted? Regarding the 'should' statement at the end, I'm confused as to whether it's part of the UN document or an original assertion of the writer. If it is the latter, it should be naturally be removed as an NPOV violation. Richard001 08:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Most of the organisations mentioned two paragraphs above by UserMa7346 are in fact relevant to donor-conceived people, in particular, UK Donorlink.

Replacing sperm donation and egg donation with gamete donation makes sense to me.

The pages for Donor offspring and Donor conceived people should also be merged. The term "Donor offspring" is considered offensive by some, so in my opinion, Donor-conceived People (with a hyphen) should be the one page, with links as appropriate. Some other pages should also link here. I'll do it if no-one else volunteers, but I'm hoping that someone with more Wiki experience will volunteer... Ml66uk2 (talk) 01:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Merge
I merged the info here with donor conceived people.Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)