Talk:Dooo It!

Revert
I revert this edit because the info was unsourced, but I am sharing here as a reminder to find sources that verify participation in the performance by these individuals. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Spanish Wikipedia
The [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dooo_It! Spanish version of the article] is expanded and includes artwork, if that helps. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

'New York Daily News' reliability discussion
The reliability of NY Daily News (as cited to explain the genre) is under dispute. A brief discussion is available at User_talk:130.218.6.168. WP:RSP states that the source is generally reliable but can have exaggerated headlines. In my opinion, this is a reasonable use of the site as a source, especially since there is no other good source available from a brief Google search.

If someone can find a higher-quality source, I completely support changing it. Thriftycat (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Reliable sources/Perennial sources says, "Most editors consider the content of New York Daily News articles to be generally reliable, but question the accuracy of its tabloid-style headlines." --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Another Believer Does this mean it is permissible? I'm still new to this stuff, sorry. Thriftycat (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't see that you linked to RSP in your comment. I don't have a problem with the source being used in this instance, though I agree a replacement is appropriate if a better source exists. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks for weighing in Thriftycat (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)