Talk:Dope.security

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... It includes citations to secondary sources coverage, so this organization meets notability guidelines. --Arbor to SJ (talk) 15:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Crunchbase is not a reliable source. ❌
 * Dope Security's own website and company-authored document are primary sources, which can't establish notability. ❌
 * Silicon Republic looks reliable but a sizeable portion of the article is an interview with company staff, which is also a primary source. ❌
 * Security Week seems reliable, but given the problems with the other sources, I don't know if it's enough to establish notability.
 * --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The source cited was TechCrunch, not CrunchBase. Also, I've added another secondary source (FinSMEs); the number of secondary sources provided should be sufficient to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Arbor to SJ (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The source cited was TechCrunch, not CrunchBase. Also, I've added another secondary source (FinSMEs); the number of secondary sources provided should be sufficient to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Arbor to SJ (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)