Talk:Doris Stevens/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 19:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Lede
 * "organizer. She was in charge of organizing the women's congress, held at the Panama Pacific Exposition in 1915. When the CUWS became the National Woman's Party (NWP) in 1916, Stevens organized" -Can you find a way to reword "organizr/img/ed to avoud rep?
 * ✅ Not really anything in thesaurus, I guess a labor organizer/union organizer is just that, but I called her a "national strategist" which to my thinking is what she did. SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Jailed for Freedom -year in brackets?
 * ✅ SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Early life
 * Link Omaha?
 * ✅ SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Suffrage
 * Palace Hotel, in San Francisco.
 * ✅ SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Equality
 * "Stevens served as vice chairman of NWP’s New York branch,[4] spearheaded the NWP Women for Congress campaign in 1924. " did you mean to add an and before "spearheaded"?
 * ✅, no, I actually meant spearheading. Fixed it.SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * League of Nations should be linked in the first instance and delinked elsewhere (at the bottom).
 * ✅ SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Later career
 * "From 1951 to 1963, " -new paragraph needed
 * ✅ SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Wonderfully comprehensive and well written. Can find little wrong with it, great job, and ♦  Dr. Blofeld  12:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * you rock! Thank you so much. Coming from you, that is high praise indeed. We worked hard on her. SusunW (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: