Talk:Doug Inglish

CorenSearchBot Follow-Up
I removed the information that was directly from Doug Inglish's personal biography on his website, but I left his client list as it is also cited from links other than his website. --PhotoFan76 (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. -- — Cactus Writer |   needles  23:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest, notability?
This is one of several dozen articles created by this person’s agent. (It was not necessarily done with their knowledge.) It should be reviewed for notability, conflict of interest and neutral language. For more details, see: — A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:41, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist (permanent link)


 * It's questionable, but wikipedia editors are notoriously uneven about this issue of notability. You find nearly every porn star has a wikipedia page, but accomplished authors and scientists and artists routinely fall victim to deletionist editors (you get a lot more rewards with editing perks and powers from thousands of mindless edits like that than anyone has done by actually contributing information to articles or writing new articles).  DonPMitchell (talk) 23:39, 8 January 2015 (UTC)