Talk:Douglas Crockford

Criticism
I tagged the section "Criticism" with BLP unsourced section, please read and address the hidden comments added at the same time before removing the tag. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 19:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Removed tag because the main reference in the section is to a CNet article, which is not a blog, not self published, and so far as I can see is a reliable secondary source, contradicting the assertion in the hidden comments that the references are all poor quality. The other references are primary sources, which while they might be unacceptable if relied upon exclusively, they merely support the CNet secondary source. Javalangstring (talk) 10:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

'No Evil' license
Regarding the 'IBM exception': unless minion & customer are precisely & restrictively defined, it seems plausible that almost any person on the planet could fall into one of these terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:e00:de7:8852:5719:94a2:40cb (talk • contribs) 23:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Has anyone of you with the slightest legal understanding ever watched the Youtube video of Crockford's talk? He is obviously aware that his license is proprietary to the point the it makes any usage of his software potentially illegal. Otherwise IBM would not frequently ask him for a license to use his software. Crockford is not stupid and, given his past as CEO, he understands the legal reason for IBM's repeated requests full well. He is also well aware that his letter to IBM constitutes a legally binding license grant for usage of his software, as is apparent from his careful naming of IBM, its customers and partners (which are clearly defined legal terms) and despite his adding of the nonsense-term "minions", which has no legal meaning. He knows that open source projects mistook his license for an open source license but he thinks this is their own fault and mocks them as whiners. Just remind yourself that as a former CEO he is aware of the legal implications of what he is describing and watch the section of the video: his smug and condescending tone is very telling. -- 77.20.94.233 (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Well, no. The "no evil" clause is not legally enforceable and in the event of a legal conflict, it'd be ignored but the remainder of the license terms would still apply. That's the way contract law works in the United States, where Crockford is from, anyhow. 173.90.143.23 (talk) 00:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Born
"Frostbyte Falls, MN" is a joke, right? For what it's worth, he apparently graduated from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newport_Harbor_High_School#Notable_alumni Dprent (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Douglas Crockford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070206145513/http://www.almaden.ibm.com:80/cs/new_paradigms/crockfor.html to http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/new_paradigms/crockfor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Douglas Crockford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206145513/http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/new_paradigms/crockfor.html to http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/new_paradigms/crockfor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Maintenance and rating of JavaScript articles
Concerning editing and maintaining JavaScript-related articles...

Collaboration...
If you are interested in collaborating on JavaScript articles or would like to see where you could help, stop by WikiProject JavaScript and feel free to add your name to the participants list. Both editors and programmers are welcome.

Where to list JavaScript articles
We've found over 300 JavaScript-related articles so far. If you come across any others, please add them to that list.

User scripts
The WikiProject is also taking on the organization of the Wikipedia community's user script support pages. If you are interested in helping to organize information on the user scripts (or are curious about what we are up to), let us know!

If you have need for a user script that does not yet exist, or you have a cool idea for a user script or gadget, you can post it at User scripts/Requests. And if you are a JavaScript programmer, that's a great place to find tasks if you are bored.

How to report JavaScript articles in need of attention
If you come across a JavaScript article desperately in need of editor attention, and it's beyond your ability to handle, you can add it to our list of JavaScript-related articles that need attention.

Rating JavaScript articles
At the top of the talk page of most every JavaScript-related article is a WikiProject JavaScript template where you can record the quality class and importance of the article. Doing so will help the community track the stage of completion and watch the highest priority articles more closely.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)