Talk:Doxbin (2018)

My perspective on duplication and A10
My perspective on WP:A10:

So it seems like it may technically be a different website from the original Doxbin, but it mentioned it was "recreated" in 2018? There's a section about "New Doxbin" as well. So I think it duplicates that content. This is a sentence that doesn't really say improve any of what's already there, and this is a recently created article. The main thing about whether or not A10 would apply is whether or not this counts as a plausible redirect, imo. Maybe I should just boldly redirect this? I don't know.

In regards to the person who created this article, this explains what's considered "notable" for seperate articles on Wikipedia. If there's sources like that for the Doxbin that was recreated in 2018 and it's recognized as its own distinct topic, we could likely have a seperate article for this. Clover moss (talk) 01:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)