Talk:Doxorubicin/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I will do the GA Reassessment of this article as part of the GA Sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Admittedly this is outside my scope of expertise. That said I read the article with interest and tried to understand some of the more scientific aspects. The article is good, I did add a sentence to the lead to encompass the historical origins of the compound. This was the only item in the article that I could not find in the lead. Per WP:lead the lead should contain a summary of every topic found in the body of the article. The images are good, the content is comprehensive, the references are credible and formatted correctly. At this point I think the article meets the current GA Criteria and as such I will keep it at GA. H1nkles (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)