Talk:Dracula (1931 Spanish-language film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The helper5667 (talk · contribs) 03:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

This article looks great, but i have a few suggestions

In the opening section can you put "In 2015, Dracula was selected for the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".

In the production section, i don't think Lupita Tovar CM629.jpg fits the section well. I'd suggest removing it.

Otherwise, looks pretty cohesiveThe helper5667 (talk) 03:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi. I've added the quote. I feel like the picture of Lupita is good as it's her during the time of release of Dracula. I did something previously on my work I did for The Invisible Man (1933). It's a free image as well, so I don't think it hurts, especially as she was one of the longest surviving members of the cast.Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I've changed the picture to one from the film that was in the commons. How is this? Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Look great--The helper5667 (talk) 06:18, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - Great, well done The helper5667 (talk) 11:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)