Talk:Draga Mašin

assassin
Queen Draga was killed in Belgrad Revolution.The assassin of Queen and the Kİng was made in the palace.And their bodies thrown away from the window of the palace to the garden which was situated on Saint Mİchelle Street.

What is the name of the place in Ibiza where Draga met her husband, King Alexander Obrenovic? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

She wasnt ALS KNOWN AS Queen Draga, she WAS QUEEN Draga!

--Boris Godunov (talk) 03:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

--Archchinook (talk) 02:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Her "Successor"
On the "Title next held by Maria of Romania as Queen Consort of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes" She was never Queen of Yugoslavia, she was the Queen of Romania, it was confused with her daughter "Maria of Romania" Who has the same name of Maria. When she married Alexander I of Yugoslavia, she became the Queen Consort and then had the personal title of "Queen Maria of Yugoslavia" And so i changed the links. Archchinook (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Family name
If her father was Pantelija Milićević Lunjevica, in that times, that means that she was Draginja-Draga Pantelić Lunjevica by her father. From 19. century Serbs have only one last name.--109.245.140.140 (talk) 20:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Date of birth
There is an inconsistency in the article, because her birth date corresponds to julian calendar used in Serbia at that time, would be september 23 in gregorian calendar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.109.48.24 (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 13:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Although I believe that a term other than the one which reportedly was used in a previous version of this article could have been used as the last word in the second last paragraph, as the author had already done in their second paragraph, and although I would think that misogyny might be an attempt at an explanation beyond the assumed adolescence, while personally preferring the term intimacy, where the sexual organs surely can be involved but where additional areas and mutual expressions of meaningful affection have a place too, the remainder of the aspects raised here, however, which caught my attention as well and which seems to be present still in this article ("consort", in its first sentence), seem very much important and I would like to thank the author, as well as the person who thought about preserving it, and express in advance my objection to its removal. lmaxmai 23 October 2020

Born 1866?
https://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%94%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0_%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%9B -- 94.135.195.186 (talk) 13:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Early life / Publications
"She even published some interesting stories for foreign journals." I would like to stress that no disrespect whatsoever is intended, however, "interesting stories" likely should raise questions of neutrality. At the same time, while this is not meant in an elitist way at all, the "some" as well as the "foreign journals" seem to present the opportunity to elaborate on what may have been an interest to respectively a passion of hers. lmaxmai 24 October 2020