Talk:DragonFable/Archive 1

Dragonfable Wiki
http://dfwiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

Most of us here know this exists? It's also in the DF Forum somewhere. RyuuTaichou 21:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

We need to make a PVP section in this for it like Characters, Wars, Doom Weapons have one but with PvP in the content area i think it is Zachary91119 02:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

DragonFable Wiki Page
I agree with the proclamation up top the dragonfable page, it really needs an entire rewrite. Alot of things are false, presumed (said before known), and it is not very orderly. PureThought 21:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Can you help us then? x_x lol RyuuTaichou 00:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually i think its getting better by the day the article is doing well it just needs a little rewriting.Andrew22k 12:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Someone needs to fix the Build of game as of now its 5.5 but may be 5.6 tomorrow on fridayZachary91119 02:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

DragonFable and Deletion
As with the past forms of this page, I highly suggest that this article be severely improved and updated should one wish to keep this page from being deleted. This page has been deleted 5 times already, for the exact same reasons this page will be too unless crucial work is done. In one week, I will put this page and any other AQ, DF, or Artix Entertainment articles that do not meet any requirements to stay on Wikipedia up for deletion. This will not delete the page right away, but if nothing is done to justify this page's presence here, the result will be the sixth time this page has deleted, which will continue to improve all reasons for administrators to keep this page from being created again much in the fashion it has been now. SnufStyle420 14:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Characters
Shouldn't the article mention the other classes in "Characters" instead of "Starting out (Classes and choices)" because you can mention that in "Characters" as well as the Guardian Class and how become one (Confirming your Guardian in AQ)? RyuuTaichou I believe that this article needs to be deleted and completely redone. Half of the info in this article is B.S. More sorces need to be cited 216.188.253.183 03:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)DDR_10_Footer@yahoo.com

Hmm... Considering that you redirected my friends page to "I am a Fag" I don't trust you. '''Leon Alistair (Talk|UserPage)

Re: Characters
*Looks Slightly annoyed* I just re wrote thais page and I have no clue what they want me to do with it!!! Anyway, could you add the Gaurdian class RyuuTaichou? I do not know anything about it.

--Leon Alistair 14:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Creator.

Right now it looks like its for decoration only and if you beat "Race to the KeyGems" when your a guardian you can buy the Guardian Blade for 5k :P RyuuTaichou

hmmm... Yeah, but some itemsare available to gaurdians only, and artix says they may end uo getting other benifits... Thanks for fixing that page, do you know what we should do for citing sources?

I'm not quite sure what we should do about citing sources yet..? BTW someone made a second DragonFable article its really bad though Dragon Fable should it go up for deletion or...? RyuuTaichou 22:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC) --Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 22:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * bitter laugh* yeah, though It does site it's sources...

This AQ Wiki says things about future classes and what they used to be called? http://wiki.aqstats.com/wiki/DragonFable and http://wiki.aqstats.com/wiki/AdventureQuest down at the DragonFable section :P RyuuTaichou 22:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean by that? --Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 23:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I was just thinking of Trivia things like how it says that Warriors were originally called BladeMaster's not sure if thats true though lol RyuuTaichou 00:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

...Sweet. --Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 00:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Merge 2nd article
This information from Dragon Fable needs to be merged into the article. Then that page will be made into a redirect. -- hibou 09:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

If that means you guys won't delete myarticle I am all for it! I'll add the information that is not alread there.

--Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 12:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Personally, I don't think that the second Dragon Fable article be merged, I'm going to nominated it in WP:AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion). And when it is deleted we can put in a redirect. My reason is that this article has undergone some pretty serious un-reverted vandalism. So it shouldn't be merged. §†SupaSoldier†§ 16:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Man, this is going to be harder to delete than I thought. There is already an archived discussion on a previous deleteion of the page Dragon Fable. §†SupaSoldier†§ 16:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I think there's a simpler way of going about things. If you take the info not in this article, and add it, we can just turn the other into a redirect (w/o deleting it, i.e. conserving it's history). -- hibou 20:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I've already done that! *smiles* --Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 20:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok then I've gone ahead and made the redirect. If there's anything you missed in the merge, go check out the article's history. -- hibou 22:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Sources?!
Alright now I am ticked. I spent hours finding all the sources that I got my information from and citing them and now they are gone! and that message on sources is back! WHY?

OOPs, yeah umm what's a first party source, and Don't bite the newbies, how am I supposed to know! Anyway I merged it.--Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 12:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Spacing
Do we double space right before the External links? It doesn't seem right to me? RyuuTaichou 18:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

No clue... You gotta remmember I only got here three day sago!!!

--Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 19:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

One Victory For the Team!
Members of the DFTF (DragonFableTaskForce), I just checked, this article is no longer up for deletion, it may still need work but we've done what we've set out to do. That doesn't mean to back off though. If we want to keep it this way we have a lot of work to do.

See you guys Later *walks away with a huge grin on face* --Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 19:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

The Doom Weapons
I don't think its worth to mention this unless we have a current plot section and BTW there are too many typos on the page >.< EDIT: Wait I've just expanded it so it goes more with our current plot :P RyuuTaichou 21:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Sinitsu 16:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)== War Meter == I added a war meter, please update it constantly.

What if their isn't a war? And remember to sign your posts RyuuTaichou 00:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC) You Suck, ***

Dragon Amulet
Shouldn't it have its own section like Guardianship in AQ? I could try making it on the weekend but it would be nice to have some help :P RyuuTaichou 04:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That'd be cool...but I wouldn't really try. Mergists on Wiki will just vote to merge it, and the vote will most likely pan out resulting in a merge. §†SupaSoldier†§  20:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Note to newer people editing the article
Hello, and thank you for your help on the project!

We really apriciate your interest, but in all honesty we really do not need to know about how Warriors can wield staffs and the damage difference if you wield one instead of a sword, sorry! By the way, pleas check your typos before you make an edit, cleaning them up isn't to fun. *smiles* See you later! :P RyuuTaichou 21:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

revised --Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 22:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Note to Editors of this article
Don't bite the Newbies. I used to be a Newbie once, (So did you for that matter) and personaly I did not like being bitten. *coughs* RyuuTaichou *end cough* --Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 22:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

>.> I didn't mean to bite them lol RyuuTaichou 23:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I knew that. --Be Well and Battle On: Leon Alistair 23:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

The Story
Do we really need to make a new article just for the story of DragonFable? I don't see people in the AdventureQuest article creating a another article for The'Galin. RyuuTaichou 20:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

...Yes. This is the first official storyline for DF oh and by the way... there are no people in the AQ aricle. Supa soldier hasn't done anything to it in ages.

'''Leon Alistair (Talk|UserPage)

Wha really? Ill try and help back their too if I can but the DragonFable storyline can use a rewrite no point in just listing chapters. :S RyuuTaichou 20:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I put it in because it tells you the role the chapters have what they do a list etc. it is helpful and has some depth.

people
Just intrested but about how many people edit this article regularly?? Andrew22k 18:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

--User:Andrew22k

Wars
if anyone can find out the amount of waves needed for defeat in each war that could help ;) Andrew22k 11:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Pst you need to defeat about 2million unless Cysero is mean -_- But this war is longer for some reason

"I'm never mean *looks annoyed* Oh that was a typo! I knew that. (Cyerso is another of my names...)" '''Leon Alistair (Talk|UserPage)

Made some minor edits for War.Sinitsu 01:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

If you Add new things
We would all personally like to thank you, whatever you contribute is all ways welcome.

Sinitsu 16:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I knew you were gonna say that! Lol well when you contribute remember RyuuTaichou is always watching O_O lol RyuuTaichou 00:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Also remember no Vandilism, It is frowned upon by people like RyuuTaichou

Sinitsu 16:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

"*places chin in hands and shakes head smiling* having fun you two?"

I never vandalize (spelled correctly) I can just joke around once in awhile. As well sign your posts. RyuuTaichou 01:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

that was me.

How does he vandalize:S he is a valuable member of the dragonfable article how dare you say that! and who are you:S:S. Andrew22k 16:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

'''Leon Alistair (Talk|UserPage)

-_-? I never said he vandilized anything Sinitsu 01:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Added Town Reconstruction
I added the town reconstuction you cant take it down when the town is being rebuilt...

Sinitsu 16:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

How can you say that why would we take it down we're not about deleting things omg. how about actually helping us and adding stuff to the story, wars and the general article(perfect:))Andrew22k 16:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

He means we wont be needing that section later because the town will be back up lol RyuuTaichou 21:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

whats the point then lol its getting built today. Andrew22k 18:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

He posted this awhile ago he just added the date RyuuTaichou 18:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Woot finally :) Town's coming back and its at 95%, Now where is that Cysero, -_- Gonna hit him with a fish then dress him up as a fish icecream sundai and send twig after him :)--== Call me Lan, or else!== 21:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Show peole shops

forums
who goes on the forums here? i do for one and im thinking about adding a forums section to the article because it is quite popular for AE gamers. what do you think? Andrew22k 19:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I go on the forums but I don't think we should add a section maybe just mention it for stuff like the rumors or future updates. RyuuTaichou 01:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

DragonFable Monsters
Do you think it would be appropriate to make a seprate wikipedia page listing the enemis in Dragonfable in alphabetical order, giving information on each enemie? ATRUEZELDAFAN 11:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

maybe if someone actually dedicated themselfs to it and if its not just left then yes id be more than happy to help out.Andrew22k 18:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

That would be too much people can just visit the DF Encyclopedia on the forums. RyuuTaichou 18:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Gameplay
Hey guys I'm going to be changing and updating this section more and more so it can be more appropriate for an RPG article so I'd kinda like as little distraction as possible thanks. ^^ RyuuTaichou 07:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Xan
Why was Xan removed from NPC's with Current Significance? He is a main Character. Shouldn't he be mentioned?ATRUEZELDAFAN 11:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I have all the NPCs profile saved on my computer so if we need them again I can just add em on :P RyuuTaichou 16:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

picture
no laughs lol you guys know im kinda new but can you upload a screenshot of DF and how do you do so? give me some help! lol. Andrew22k 16:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC) I know how to take a screenshot and that so i put it into pain fix it up then change it into jpg then it says corrupt in wikipedia:S and what exactually do i need to type in the description box.Andrew22k 17:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm trying to get high quality images on the DF page not like it was saved on paint because the color gets reduced lol RyuuTaichou 17:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC) What will i use then? and can you tell me??

new section
Im thinking about adding a new section to with the relationship between players and staff(like artix) and to mention things like the player votes to see what to with money donated(town reconstuction) whats your thoughts?Andrew22k 16:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

What? I don't quite understand your sentence? RyuuTaichou 16:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I might make a section to the DF article about the relationship between the staf and players cause like when players want something it usually happens like now how were choosing what to spend money on, great idea i think(vote). what do you think and can u help me with the above question about pics lol.Andrew22k 17:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Like player suggestions? I saw someone put that in the Trivia section on AdventureQuest... But it was taken down. x_x RyuuTaichou 17:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Falconreach
I think that's an unnecessary part of the article if you check out other RPG articles they don't list their each of their cities in a specific section and describe it, they just mention it in parts of the article and give a brief description. Because if we keep adding stuff like this and that the article is going to become way too long. Someone can make a section in the DragonFable Storyline or a Setting in DragonFable in gameplay about the setting instead of putting it in the main article. BTW if you think I'm being mean I'm just doing what I think is right in making a good article. RyuuTaichou 17:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

chickencow armour
i know the pic is a bit big but it will fit in when new armours come outAndrew22k 13:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry I resized it lol RyuuTaichou 16:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

thanks lol how do you resise an image?Andrew22k 18:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I think it's something like 100px in between |thumb|here|right/left| I think? lol RyuuTaichou 18:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

this month
lots coming up, eh? can't wait lol.

Yeah but I'm mostly worried about all the vandalism thats gonna come.. x_x RyuuTaichou 22:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC) what do you mean:S:S??Andrew22k 13:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

You know? Vandalism? on the DragonFable Wikipedia page? RyuuTaichou 21:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Yea but i dont usually see any:S do you think when new players play the game they will try and help out here?Andrew22k 10:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

It's because I revert it pretty fast lol and I wouldn't recommend advertising the DF Wikipedia page because I saw a thread on the forums today and their was a lot of stuff I had to revert and fix x_x RyuuTaichou 15:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Why dont we block people editing that are not members so that only people who are members ccan edit like the AQ article?Andrew22k 15:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

White Dragon Box
If you have any information it would be greatly appreatiated. Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 01:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Lol don't worry come tomorrow we will have more info. :P And I'm guessing that the WDB is good and the BDB is bad thats why Valencia was surprised to see you after the BDB and not the WDB. I think..? RyuuTaichou 01:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

"THE DRAGONLORD’S SECRET This week in the Dragon Egg Saga Finale, Twilly will send you to visit a Wizard that will help you figure out which is the right egg. What the other players don’t know is that somewhere out there is the White Dragon Box. How the boxes got switched so that the good guys have the Black one and the bad guys have the White one, we don’t know. But I will leak out this... the villain who currently possesses the White Dragon Box... his name starts with an S.", from the newsletter=), its obviously sepulcherAndrew22k 10:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

You can't assume that yet even if it is pretty obvious lol RyuuTaichou 15:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I know lol its my opinuin forgot to put in in;).Andrew22k 15:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure its him, though the AE could send in a New NPC villain -_- We all know them well enough not to expect the expected.Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 21:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

yea lol.Andrew22k 13:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Spoilers
are we allowed to put spoilers on here or is it like the forums where you cant. if so please tell us some lolAndrew22k 14:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean? :S RyuuTaichou 15:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Like where things are how to get things etc.Andrew22k 15:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC) spoilers r aloud ive got 1! robina is a princess and alteon is her father! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sennsa (talk • contribs) 22:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Country
hey what country are you guys from??Andrew22k 14:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Not the place to ask this? lol RyuuTaichou 15:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Not sure this is in right place but I live in Canada :p Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 21:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Dragons!
soon we will have a full sized dragon or pet dragon if you are a non-DA. thats chapter 1 of DF finished and i thought it was great. what egg did you get??(#)http://forums2.battleon.com/f/tm.asp?m=8661540 <<have a look at this for predictions of what element the dragon will be i havnt picked yet i think im going to wait until i know what they turn out as.

And this is important why? Also sign ur posts :P with four of these (~) :p Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 19:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Dragon Section
Soon I'm going to add a section about Dragon information, like custimazation but I dont have the time to expand it, so I will really need help on this.

Ps. Dont mercilessly Edit it so it doesn't have anything from what i put like when I put the doom weapons section and you made it 0_0 Kinda better but still -_-Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 19:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Thats already in the storyline? and there is a chance all the dragons wont be different but thats a small chance lol RyuuTaichou 19:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Il help out but what do you mean:SAndrew22k 21:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

There is a large chance that they will be diffrent, was gorgok diffrent from the ice dragon? They will have their own colour based on the egg, also they will have diffrent elements, and the storyline only entitles getting the Dragon, I'm talking about if you can raise it or how to fly it anc things like that :p. Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 22:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I know I just said... You don't have to take it so seriously x_x lol RyuuTaichou 22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

War Numbers
we only have two more to fill in and that includes the 1st war and the haloween war if anyone can find out that will be helpful.

i have been trying to find out for ages:@ lol.Andrew22k 13:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Some random IP filled it so we can't be sure if it's fake or not. RyuuTaichou 20:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Friday the 13th war
who put in the war for it:S i dont remember artix saying anything about it. its usually october the friday the 13th wars:S.13:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

If you go on the forum people are talking about it and Artix was talking about it in the DN. :P RyuuTaichou 16:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Putputtime
The User http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Puttputttime Has been posting crude pictures in this Article so I'm going to see if I can get it and Adventure quest Semi-Protected. Efrit

yea thats a good idea.Andrew22k 14:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I was stayed up kinda late last night so I couldn't do anything about vandalism x_x RyuuTaichou 16:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Guardion Skills
Ok I know of two of the skills, g blast and g shock. Should I made a list, ps im not a guardion -_- so I need help from guardions. Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 23:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm a guardian and DA so it's all good :P RyuuTaichou 23:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Then all you need to do is do the quests, go to the guy with the armour and instead of shop its train, take the quests, but from 3 on I think you need the G-Blade. Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 23:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Yep exactly :P and I think there are 13 quests RyuuTaichou 23:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you will be able to get the power to summon the G-Dragon, also may go through the g towers to inpower your G-Blades -_- Please tell me what you do in the quests. Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 23:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Wait I'm just got back from dinner and now I'm gonna re-do the Guardian Blade quest for the lvl 29 guardian blade RyuuTaichou 23:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Your actually gonna spend 9k on a weapon that does major random damage 0_0 1-99. Thats insane!Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 01:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah It does better damage then the old one, I'm gonna stick with the Guardian class and... I had a lot of money :P RyuuTaichou 01:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

I have a DA and i am a gaurdian aswell:) but this is so annoying my war is invisable and i dont think my guardian skills are working yet:S:@. oh and yes i cleared my cache. Lol i got it working after i used the dragonlord server:). see the classes tho in this article i think it should be called something else cause you'll have other classes which will be different and not 'secondery' if you know what i mean.Andrew22k 13:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah a lot of people had that error..? Luckily I didn't get it the first time and how about "Alternate Classes" instead of "Secondary" :P RyuuTaichou 20:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Isn't it one of the main classes? Guardions have an important part in the story Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 23:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

The main classes are the starting 3? I think we may need to rename the characters... Oh and you spelled Guardian wrong? o.o RyuuTaichou 23:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

yea or even just 'other classes' cause i beleive like AQ the clsses will lead to each other like mage, wizard to necro.Andrew22k 12:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Other still seems kinda plain? How about Additional Classes? RyuuTaichou 19:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

yea.Andrew22k 20:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Guardians have a Very important part in the story line, They quest to save the guardion towers and break apart the BoA, so they deserve to be recognized as very important, they are almost as important as the Dragon Lords so yeah Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 23:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Break apart the Blade of Awe o.o? So what are you suggesting we name the section? RyuuTaichou 00:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Since you aren't responding I'm currently changing it to Additional Classes until you can think of something we all agree on. RyuuTaichou 00:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

War at see
who keeps on changing the number so that there is an extra 10,000 on it that is wrong the war count keeps going after a war but stops at 100% which means the numbers can go high.Andrew22k 21:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure but I recall Cysero putting in extra numbers to the war? RyuuTaichou 21:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

He made us kill 10k more to see if we would go crazy, which we did. But its war metre until you hit boss. so its 2,010,000 Ļăŋ, Đřăĝόŉ Ķňĭģħŧ Ŏf Ĺĭģĥť 23:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Price raise
The doom daggers price went from 25k to 28k : (

Yeah they did but this isn't the place to talk about this... :P RyuuTaichou 00:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Dragon eggs
Im lev 28 and saving for doom daggers...ne way when will the dragon eggs hatch? JimmyCow7:30pm April 23 07

It is currently unknown. Oh and don't add your posts to the top. RyuuTaichou 00:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

In my opiniun i think friday but who knows everyone keeps asking on the forums and stuff so all you hae to do is wait a couple days to a few weeks.Andrew22k 15:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC) This isn't the place for this, take it to the AE forumsLego3400: The Sage of Time 15:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

They hatch on June 10. So get your eggs cuz you have less then a month till hatch date.

Crude Pictures
Someone keeps posting crude pictures :|Andrew22k 15:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I'm thinking it could be one guy because he keeps using the same pictures? RyuuTaichou 01:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Features to come
Alot of it has nothing to do with dragonfable such as the mingame site?Andrew22k 13:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Then get rid of some? I'll help lol RyuuTaichou 21:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

New water weapons
Ok you know how in the Doom weapon section they talk about the frost weapons, can I put the new water weapons since they are as strong as the frost, for example third frost giant vs wavecrest iv are the same. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sinitsu (talk • contribs) 21:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC).

Hey your back! Answer my comment on the Guardian Skills. :P

Anyway I don't think the new water weapons hold anything to the story... RyuuTaichou 21:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Big Question: Is the DragonFable article ready to have those tags removed?
Some people think so and some people don't? I honestly think it doesn't really need a rewrite but maybe a cleanup or something else? RyuuTaichou 21:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

They tags need removed completly.Andrew22k 14:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Dragons
When Dragons come on the 8th where exactually will we be adding them into the article, i suggest under Dragon amulet?Andrew22k 11:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

I think the Dragons should be in the article but people are mentioning the DragonLord Saga which belongs in the story line... RyuuTaichou 17:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

The dragonlord saga will be the next chapter and like quests and stuff messing about with dragons, but the actual dragon and what you caan do with it should be there.

Yeah exactly! ;) RyuuTaichou 18:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

This page is dated. Has it not been revealed that due to alterations to the timelines of both games that AQ and DF now effectively occur in paralell worlds not in the same reality? 71.230.115.25 00:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

? I'm pretty sure it's in the future RyuuTaichou 21:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Confusion
Hmm... I'm a bit confused would the Dragon we have now for DA's be titan or massive? Yes this is for the article plus I think we may have to merge DragonLord and DragonRider together somehow... RyuuTaichou 21:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

What The Heck!?
Sorry for Outrage... "The number 33 is the divine number of Jesus, God in human form, suggesting that Artix himself is infact like God." What the hell is that doing there? There's no source of it, and seems like POV to me!! --201.230.43.116 01:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I think I may be the only person here who's actually popping in and out on Wikipedia but I don't really have the time to revert ALL these edits when I'm on vacation... x_x If anyone can help revert it would be a huge help. RyuuTaichou 03:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

References...
I've attempted to fix these (to the best of my knowledge), but someone might want to go back in history and undo the damage instead. --Nemi133 13:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Complaints
I see that someone has deleted my unoriginal gameplay complaints. While I appreciate that you may feel this is an invalid complaint and that Dragonfable is totally and completely origanal in every way. Personally I and from what I see on some Battleon forums, Runescape forums, and most of all World of Warcraft forums a lot of other gamers think that they are a buch of stuipid unoriginal programmers who coulden't think up an idea to saves their lives. That is our complaint I will rewrite it in a (Hopefuly) neutral fasion. IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM FIX IT DON'T DELETE IT AND HOPE IT GOES AWAY!! It is as much a valid complaint as the Wars, party system, and everything else. Edit: Its done its factual and neutral in my opinion. If you think its not neutral enough FIX IT if you think its not factual enough FIX IT if you think it should be removed then have a better reason than "I can't bear to face the truth that Artix is a bunch of rip offs so I'll just get rid of this before people start to realise the truth" Thank you for reading this and good luck

Gollum the fishy hobbit 23:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC) I notice 2! I did my best to add some complaints I saw on the forums I hope that helps!- sennsa

Re complaints
I deleted your previous entry. It was in the wrong section (under DeathKnights class instead of Complaints), it was biased and, as I stated in my edit, it was already addressed in Complaints.

But seeing as WoW and Runescape invented magic, programming AND the wheel, I do understand your outrage! So, as much as I frolic and rejoice in living under this elaborate veil of denial... ...I'll leave your entry up for other participants to decide if it is suitable or not. I am currently too blinded with anguish from these horrid allegations and I need to retire to ponder my very existence. --Nemi133 01:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Re-Re complaints
Yea that was under death knights but I added a section under complaints which was also deleted after being improved apon by another person.....

While retiring might be a little excessive getting over your denial might be a not bad plan. WOW and Jagex did not invent the wheel, programming, magic, elves, orcs, humans, dwarves, goblins, Fremmenics, Gnomes, tanks, seige warfare, (Although Tauren and Vyrewatch are pretty origanal) Vampires, werewolves and many other things they have massive amounts of original gameplay. They also borrow from other people I admit. Dragonfable has some interesting and original content but there are some parts that many people myself included think are ripped strait out of other games (xan = ragnos I have fought both they the same thing pretty much). And while borrowing deathknights as MOBs might be acceptable announcing that they would release a deathknight class 3 days after WOW is very literaly ripping them off totally. (They will probably release deathknights after they look at a few youtube vids of the WOW version, but they might try to release them sooner than that) Gollum the fishy hobbit

Re-Re-Re Complaints
I don't believe I was the one who removed that section under Complaints, but I did edit it somewhat.

As for the current 'rip-off' debate under Complaints; I tidied it up a bit and fixed a few links and typos. I also changed Ragnos to Ragnaros as Ragnos is a Star Wars character. I assumed you were referring to Ragnaros in WoW so I also wikilinked it. Please edit this if I made the wrong assumption.

I also added som info on the origin of death knights. As the article was it might be misinterpreted as if WoW were the first to introduce death knights or the term "death knights". --Nemi133 15:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and what ARE the similarities between Ragnaros and Xan besides the element Fire? --Nemi133 15:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Re-Re-Re-Re Complaints
Artix Entertainment games frequently spoof many movies and games, I don't understand how this is any different from the "Zardwarts Wand" or "300 Elite Knights", Dragon Fable has a very satirical nature, but I wouldn't say it rips-off other games. Besides, like it has been mentioned, WoW didn't exactly invent Deathknight.

I think that the whole Complaints section is slightly biased and, as an relatively active member of AE's forums, I haven't really heard most of them.--Fmms 20:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Another edit
I took out the bottom setion because it was obviously written by someone who has no idea what the hell they are talking about. 1st the death knight picture refrenced was for a MOB not a class. (AS I said the problem that many people including mysself have is not death knight MOBs but the fact that dragonfable decides to rip off WoW 3 days after the official announcment of wrath of the litch king, blizzard had been hinting about releaseing deathknights as a class for some time before hand) The official announcement of a death knight class for dragonfable came 3 days after blizzard. If you feel this is an injustice too darn bad, I realise that Artix has a history of parody but this is obviously not a parody. (A parody would have been "The death noob class" "The Deathly ill knight class" or something along those lines.) Its not that big of a deal so why don't you all: GET OVER IT

Gollum the fishy hobbit 17:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Getting really ticked
Ok this is a message for what ever idiot keeps putting this at the bottom of the complaints section.

I would just like to state that Artix released a photo of the Deathknight on the August 2nd Design Notes. Unless AE has contacts with Blizzard employees and knew that the class would be released, it is not a rip-off.

There are two problems with this First the use of "I" obviously. Then the fact that this has no bearing as it is a picture of a death knight MOB, as in mobile object, monster, Non player character, boss. Not class.......

Take a look and you will see the class announcement is on august 6th 3 days after the announcment of deathknights by blizzard (More than enough time to draw a picture)if you want further proof I will try to find the thread on the wow forums "Death Knight evidence" that was written some time after the release of burning crusade with a compilation of evidence that death knights would be released as a hero class. how ever it may have been deleted as death knights were announced. Gollum the fishy hobbit 19:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Any citation would further the credibility of this article, so I'd welcome it. I do however understand the confusion about the DeathKnights objections. Perhaps the fact that the complaint, as I see it, is based on the chosen time of the announcement of the class "DeathKnights" (WoW/DF) should be stressed to make the issue more clear? --Nemi133 18:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Some one with brains
Finally someone with brains! (Maybe) the complaint with death knights is simple

August 3rd Blizzard announces the release of the long awaited hero class deathknight class in additition to exsisting death knight mobs.

August 6th Artix announces playable death knight class in additition to exsisting Deathknight MOBs

The issuse: many people feel the only reason that artix felt it nessesary to release death knights AS A CLASS was because Blizzard did it.

Is this put in simple enough terms for you to understand??????

Stolen Content Complaints
I don't feel it should be included. Blizzard didn't invent the DeathKnight.DK's were in D&D.Most things were originated in Dungeons and Dragons.If you include the fact that gamers allege AE steals content from other games, then go ahead and edit all of the wiki RPG's entrys with complaints saying they allegedly "stole" content from D&D. I feel complaints should only be about the Cons(as in Pros and Cons)of DF. At the very least you should add a controversies section to the article and put that subject under that title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peroxnero (talk • contribs) 00:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Complaints - DeathKnights: How is this correct?
In Complaints it says:

"Blizzard Entertainment, who created all four Warcraft games, has used Deathknights as MOBs (Movable Object Blocks) and released the Deathknight as a playable class in the 2002 Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos."

(Before I improved the piece it said: "Blizzard Entertainment who created all four Warcraft games released the Deathknight as a playable class in Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos and have used Deathknights as MOBs in World of Warcraft." As you can see I did not change the meaning.)

Shouldn't this be re-written? It clearly states that WoW had a DeathKnights class in 2002. --Nemi133 15:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Um...Warcraft III ≠ WoW.209.243.25.69 02:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

controversies
This section is in my mind perfect it states exactly what the controversy is about the release of a deathknight class that because of timing and previous history appears to be copying of blizzard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gollum the fishy hobbit (talk • contribs) 15:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

what the heck! it is just parody. would some of the most famous tv shows be funny without parody?

A loyal Dragonfable fan SwordFyre —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.56.195.41 (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

A Holiday Pic/Adding Captain Blackberry
Can someone put a DF holiday pic(Preferably Frostvale) in the Holiday Events section. Also do you folks think someone should put Captain Blackberry under the NPC heading? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.23.117.151 (talk) 21:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

some jerk
Some jerk vandalised the complaints ect I saved the controversies but the complaints seem to be gone for ever Gollum the fishy hobbit 16:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC) if u read my 1 i put on ur frst 1 i did my best i thnk i memorized some of what was there others were from the forums if its bad u can fix it sennsa and also the complaints section is gone!


 * I added the Complaints and Controversies back in as they were of October 13th 04:41 (2007). Any edits to those two entries that occurred after that is thus not included. --Nemi133 20:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

NO 6TH DOOM WEAPON!
ARTIX ONLY SAID THERE WERE 5 SO IM TAKING OUT THE PART ABOUT THE 6th DOOMY!.. But just incase heres the info


 * 6th Doom Weapon - Although it is neither mentioned or seen, some players think there are still remaining of Doom Weapons. Its weapon type is a wand because wand was a new release. And there is still more like for bows, gauntlets, shield and spear. PS. Im Lan/Sinitsu