Talk:Dragon Ball Z: Budokai/Archive 1

Lack of Dragon Ball Z Budokai 2 on HD Collection
I think we should have more info about this, saying which games are included and getting a quote as to why Budokai 2 was left out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.17.38.74 (talk) 22:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

King Kai
Since when the hell where you bale to fight King Kai? Either remove that or give me footage. UltimaFighter

Merge
I suggest that the Budokai series be merged into a series article, similar to Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi and Dragon Ball Z: The Legacy of Goku. The games really don't differ that much gameplaywise from one another, and the reception and character sections can easily be merged. DBZROCKS  Its over 9000!!!  00:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Never understood why the pages were apart. Merge away ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Fully agree. Merged is far likely to have one decent article rather than what we have now. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 00:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Agree per above comments.Tintor2 (talk) 01:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I disagree somewhat. There seems to be enough notability for the game to have their own article like the article Naruto: Clash of Ninja (series). One of the games have their own articles. DragonZero (talk) 01:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Except that Naruto: Clash of Ninja was kept as an article because it was a good article when the merger happened, and because it actually had in-depth development and reception information. This article has none of these things. DBZROCKS   Its over 9000!!!  01:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * merge merge looks beneficial to me.-- FUNK A MATIC      ~talk   13:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Maybe for the others. But I'm against merging Infinite World. That article has a lot going for it at this time. I've manged to help build it up to it's current statis. Sarujo (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The only information that really matters is the development information, which can be added to Infinte world's section in the merged article. DBZROCKS   Its over 9000!!!  19:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I too share the opposition for Infinite World, rather steadfastly I'll admit. The article has enough stand alone sourcing for it to exist by itself according to wikipedia's policies. Merging would not do any good in this case.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sourcing does not mean notability, as non notable things can be sourced. There is nothing in the article that could not exist in the merged one. DBZROCKS   Its over 9000!!!  20:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Comment are there any further objections before the merge is enacted? Consensus seems to have been established. DBZROCKS  Its over 9000!!!  23:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Disagree, are you kidding me? Each game was completely different in it's presentation of a story mode, and also gameplay improvements were added for each new game in the series. Why does it seem that every Dragon Ball game series must be merged? Do you see the Halo series merged in one? Nothing is even beneficial from this merge. Killa Koz (talk) 19:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The presentation of story mode is a neglible difference, as they are all presenting the story from the same series. Gameplay improvements can be mentioned in each individual game section as is done in Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi (series). As for Halo other stuff exists is not a valid argument, as those are two very different game series. DBZROCKS   Its over 9000!!!  19:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

SHIN BUDOKAI 3?!
Where on earth did this news come from? Is it real or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.216.199.151 (talk) 05:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC)