Talk:Dragon Warrior I & II

Add info on speedy deletion
When tagging an image (or anything) for speedy deletion, please specify what is wrong, so it can be corrected or not repeated. Icecypher 21:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Updates
I have added a bunch of things today, and have tried to source everything that I know about this game. I have added the Cover, Screen Shot for I and II, and used as best rationale for them so they should not be deleted. Anything else that should be added? Sgetz (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * wow, this looks a lot better. id suggest making the lists into paragraphs, but i dont think that would help in this situation. keep up the good work! Evaunit ♥666♥ 00:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Instead of deleting my updates, can we work on changing them from lists into paragraphs. Sgetz (talk) 13:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I have restored my edits, and changed them into Paragraphs. The information I feel is useful as it explains what is different between the 2 games. I do not see a reason to delete all of it. Perhaps we remove some of the trivial parts. Sgetz (talk) 16:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I've removed specific mentions of name changes and minor alterations, and left mention of the general translation changes and the opening scene. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I readded some of the information, but the bulk of it was unessary. Also, I beleave we should have one of the images from the old artical, so I readded the DW1 image, but I can't seem to get the formating down so it looks good.--Drkirby (talk) 14:50, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Assessment
I'm sorry to say that I do not feel that this article is up to par with C-class standards. The entire "Changes" section is confusing and should be replaced with "Gameplay". The article lacks a development section, and the reception section is outrageously short, and doesn't even have a VG Reviews box. The "Changes" section is too long in comparison with the rest of the article.

Additionally, there are only nine cites, five of which are located in the Reception section. The three-part "Changes" section relies entirely on one cite, and that's not exactly a good thing, considering how long it is. Reception needs quotes, sales data, etc. Development needs to be created.

One of the two images in the "Changes" section should preferably be removed, since they are both conveying the same thing. As little non-free media, the better.

Fix those, and re-request an assessment. Good luck! --haha169 (talk) 17:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)