Talk:Dragon kill points/FAQ

A couple of reasons: Maybe. But that's just their opinion. It doesn't stop the fact that Ted Castronova meets WP:SPS on the subject of virtual economies and that the paper was written for a conference at the University of Chicago. By fun I suspect that Ted means his paper was more accessible and less like traditional conference papers on economics. But that is also just my opinion. Sorry. That's a result of the sources available. If you can find a reliable source that covers that slice of the topic, feel free to flesh the article out.
 * Why is this article back?
 * Some actual papers have come out on the subject in peer reviewed journals.
 * Some of the previously unacceptable sources have become acceptable as their owners (namely Nick Yee) meet WP:SPS.
 * WP:RS has been clarified whereby an organization like Gamasutra can be considered a reasonably reliable source.
 * It never actually should have been deleted in the first place (maybe). This is a possibility, given that past revisions were very much a "how-to" and "pro/con" on specific DKP systems, rather than a summary of the scholarly/RS look at the issues.  Problems in article content are hard to overlook in deletion debates.
 * But didn't the last AfD determine that Castronova whitepaper was just a lark?
 * How come this talks more about social effect than actual use of DKP?