Talk:Dragons of Kir

Importance
Since the question was asked in the edit summary, I gave this game a high importance because it won an Origins Vanguard Award. Out of curiosity, what criteria would you use to rate a game's importance? There are some obvious factors like sales (but how much sales makes it "significant"), "importance" to the gaming community (but how do you measure that), influence on other games, etc. I thought that an objective criteria is that it won an award (i.e. it's a measure assigned outside of my own opinion, or lack of, about the game). And since Vanguard awards are supposed to be given to innovative games, that's why I rated it "high". --Craw-daddy | T | 00:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, of course upon closer examination I see that it wasn't Dragons of Kir that won the award, but the game to which it was a follow-up. :(  My mistake then, and you were right to fix it.  --Craw-daddy | T | 00:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Dragons of Kir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090619080748/http://www.originsgamefair.com/awards/2005 to http://www.originsgamefair.com/awards/2005
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071213054810/http://www.boardgamenews.com/index.php/boardgamenews/comments/greg_j_schloesser_gulf_gaming/ to http://www.boardgamenews.com/index.php/boardgamenews/comments/greg_j_schloesser_gulf_gaming/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)