Talk:Drakengard (video game)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator:

Reviewer: CR4ZE (talk · contribs) 05:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * The prose is excellent. I picked up a few mistakes here and there, but I decided to just copy-edit the article myself.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * Please remove Batoto.net and find replacements for Amazon.
 * Done, but I couldn't find any other sources for Drag-On Dragoon Judgement, so its existence can't be proven on this site as far as I can tell. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Both File:Drakengard Coverart.png and File:Drakengard1ground gameplay.jpg look great and have appropriate rationales.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Just fix up those couple of sources and this article's good to go. CR 4 ZE (t) 05:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Both File:Drakengard Coverart.png and File:Drakengard1ground gameplay.jpg look great and have appropriate rationales.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Just fix up those couple of sources and this article's good to go. CR 4 ZE (t) 05:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Just fix up those couple of sources and this article's good to go. CR 4 ZE (t) 05:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

✅. The article is written and sourced at a very high standard. Excellent work. CR 4 ZE (t) 08:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)