Talk:Dravya

Requested move 16 May 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. I am moving the current broad-concept article to Dravya (philosophy) for anyone who may want to selectively merge content into this article. SST flyer  09:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Dravya (Jainism) → Dravya – There is no other Dravya in destination, then no need for disambiguation. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count])  17:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose - target Dravya is a more general article. Are all these uses related only to Jainism? Dravya in Vaiśeṣika Sūtra isn't Jain is it? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Relisting comment there is already an article at the target you're proposing for this move, which is probably on a more general topic than this one. What are you suggesting we do with that other article?  &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The other "more general" article contains sourced information about Jainism only. Nothing else is sourced there. So it can be easily merged, removing unsourced info. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count])  03:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Support and merge per nom. If RS support the use of the term outside Jainism, the article can broaden to include that, and limit the Jainism material to a section, Buddhism (or whatever) material to another exception, etc.  There's not rationale under WP:SUMMARY, WP:SPLIT, WP:SPINOFF, and WP:CONTENTFORK for there to be a rich article on Dravya in Jainism, and a miserably stub purporting to be a broader article, that actually sources nothing but rehash of the Jainism-specific material.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  16:00, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.