Talk:Dream (YouTuber)

Sourcing for misconduct
I found a revision of this article that was reverted and it has somewhat left me confused. One of the sources cited in that revision mentioning the sexual misconduct allegations is Dot Esports, with its WP:VG/S listing saying that it is reliable. However, the person who did the revert claimed that it was it was unreliable for BLP use. On the VG/S entry though, there is nothing explicitly saying that it should not be used in BLPs, and as far as I know, I haven't seen anyone talk about the use of Dot Esports in biographical articles. Should we: A: Mention the sexual misconduct allegations in passing, or B: Not mention them at all and wait for other reliable sources to come out about the matter(pinging @Hemiauchenia and @Panamitsu) — 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 12:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't believe that these allegations are even remotely due. This is because exceptional claims require exceptional sources. We would need sources with a high reputation for being reliable, such as the BBC, Reuters, CNN, etc. Dream is one of the most famous Minecraft YouTubers, or even YouTubers in general, in the world, so he gets a lot of coverage by these highly reputable sources. They have not made any comments about these allegations, and there is probably a reason behind this. —Panamitsu (talk) 12:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Agreed. These are very serious allegations, and they've only been covered by low quality sources. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2024
Theprook (talk) 01:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Quiero editar La Página
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.   [[User:CanonNi ]]  (talk • contribs) 01:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Name change
Currently, "Dream"s real name is written in the article as "Clay". I think this should be updated to his full name which is "Clayton Ray Huff". Over here is his linkedin page confirming his identity: [Https://www.linkedin.com/in/clayton-ray-huff-1a5425289/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/clayton-ray-huff-1a5425289/]

Editor comments say that the name should not be changed without user consensus, and I think it's about time the name gets updated. Are there any reasons not to change his name? Googoogootoo (talk) 10:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

I love your videos 2604:3DC0:0:2439:C73:D13E:D40:6643 (talk) 17:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)