Talk:Dream SMP/Archive 1

Fancruft
, do you have any specific things you would like to see fixed? I realise that the description of in-universe events sounds silly, but summarising the plot is something we afford most media and covered well by sources. 15 (talk) 09:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It needs to be written in such a way that someone unfamiliar with the Dream SMP could understand it, which is not the case currently. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I could try to explain it further in a more understandable way, but I am not sure how to go about it regarding sources. Millee (she/her) (talk) 04:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you added fanpov and context tags to the article. As I am not familiar with the meaning of "general tagging", would you mind explaining what parts of the article have issues and how they might be fixed? 15 (talk) 14:39, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Recent edit
Hi, I appreciate your recent edit to expand the article, but please be careful not to hijack references, as you did when adding Due to the nature of the story being told within the medium of survival Minecraft, where it is easy to accidentally die in-game, character deaths are only counted as canonical if they pertain to the plot and are pre-planned. As such, each character can only die three times (with certain exceptions) and Having influenced it's title and some content (regarding heat waves). I have undone these parts of your edit, but you are free to reinstate them if you can find high quality sources. Best, 15 (talk) 13:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * My apologies, my aim was to explain further but I now understand that the information was referenced. Millee (she/her) (talk) 04:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Name
, while I would also be inclined to have it moved to Dream SMP, a past move has been contested, see the history of Dream SMP, meaning that some discussion might be warranted. If we wanted to move the article, see WP:MOR. 15 (talk) 00:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I just started a topic on the move. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 00:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 31 May 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved  (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Dream SMP server → Dream SMP – "Server" is not needed in the name. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 01:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. A more WP:COMMONNAME than having 'server' in the title. SWinxy (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support as the one who initially proposed the change. Ionmars10 (talk) 03:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support because it is a simpler name, and SMP automatically refers to a server; so the original title is redundant. Billy Beagle (talk) 13:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Why is this a requested technical move? Can't we just CSD G6 the target page given its minor history if consensus to move is achieved? 15 (talk) 10:10, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Per WP:RM. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , no, I'm asking why this is a technical move. Why is it listed at WP:RM instead of WP:RM? Usual procedure should be WP:CSD G6 after consensus given that no content originating from the article existed there. This is not supposed to be some weird gotcha, but I wonder if I am missing anything. 15 (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * "While I would also be inclined to have it moved to Dream SMP, a past move has been contested." - This is what you said before; a past move has been contested. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , what is the technical restriction that makes you list it at WP:RM instead of WP:RM? 15 (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * "Use this process if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested." KullyKeemaKa (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * "The technical moves procedure can also be used for uncontroversial moves when the requested title is occupied by an existing article." KullyKeemaKa (talk) 16:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , there is no existing article, it is a redirect, hence WP:RM should suffice? 15 (talk) 16:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I just removed the page move request from the technical requests section. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 16:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok 15 (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Support deleting target page and renaming by move per WP:COMMONNAME. 15 (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:COMMONNAME. In common speech, from my experience, it's much more commonly referred to as "the Dream SMP" rather than with "server" at the end. - 𝙷𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚎𝚗𝙼𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚜   (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 22:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. Not only necessary via WP:COMMONNAME, but in general there is little to no reason to specify the specific server as the term itself inherently describes the server. Nekomancerjade (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3VTVnLLsGU
This Youtube video is a good source of information on the dream smp. Kind regards, JJK2000 (talk) 10:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2021
Please write the history general 72.68.28.12 (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Terasail [✉️] 16:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately we have to adhere to WP:DUE, meaning that the parts of the article have to reflect the extent of coverage by sources. While I understand that the in-universe history plays a big role for DSMP fans, usable sources tend to focus on other aspects of the topic. 15 (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Heat Waves
Heat Waves isn't a Dream SMP fanfiction, it's just a fanfic about Dream, the YouTuber, although it is sometimes incorrectly referred to as a Dream SMP fic despite it having nothing to do with the server's plot or characters. I think the section about it should be moved to his page instead? Serilly (talk) 00:26, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification. I did add it to Dream's article, but it was removed because other users rejected it as "fancruft", despite it being talked about in multiple reliable sources. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I have restored the section because Heat Waves seems to take place within the Dream SMP. Parts of the section are probably a bit tangential, such as Dream's attitude towards fan fiction, but Heat Waves is definitely related to the SMP and illustrates the cultural impact of it quite well. 15 (talk) 14:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Heat Waves definitely does not take place in the SMP. It is a RPF fic with no relation to the SMP's plot or characters. The fic makes it very obvious that it takes place irl, with mentions of characters flying to meet each other, calling each other on Discord, and streaming / their Twitch chats. I can say with 100% certainty that Heat Waves is unrelated to the SMP. --Serilly (talk) 00:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , would "within the Dream Team" or "among the members of Dream SMP" work better? I realise now that the BBC source does not provide for "within the Dream SMP" and just refers to the Youtube commmunity more generally. 15 (talk) 13:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I think the former works better --Serilly (talk) 22:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find a source supporting my suggestion, just that they are the co-founders of the SMP in the Polygon fanfic piece, so I added that they are the co-founders. Not ideal, but should hopefully clarify the connection to the server somewhat. 15 (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Why does this article exist?
I don't think minecraft "smp" should qualify as a wikipedia article. FizzoXD (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It has received feature-length pieces in multiple news publications, it clearly qualifies for an article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

You "don't think minecraft "smp" should qualify as a wikipedia article"? Any reasons? Kind regards, JJK2000 (talk) 14:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't think it shouldn't be an article as much as the article's contents don't provide an objective viewpoint on how it relates to the real world, internet culture, or minecraft itself. It reads like a wiki fanfic, and there's so much more things the article can say that it isn't. 2603:7000:1F00:6B91:5008:4B2E:3157:720D (talk) 00:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * There is a section on its cultural impact? I'm also surprised that you think it reads like a fanfic, I think it is very light on in-universe details compared to other articles on fiction.
 * If there is anything else it should say but isn't, you are free to make specific suggestions. Keep in mind that additions have to be reliably sourced and that the article has to reflect media coverage of the subject (WP:DUE). 15 (talk) 06:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Well for one, there shouldn't be a "Plot" section. This isn't a story, it's a server organized by internet personalities. Just like there's no "Plot" or "History" section to 2b2t, all that's there are notable occurences that reflect the server and the real world, as well as in depth sections on when how and why it was made. I don't follow SMP at all but reading the article I only know more about its lore and plot, but little about how and when it was created, its impact on minecraft, gaming, or internet culture, how it relates to the real world, etc. It just looks like a wiki fic 2603:7000:1F00:6B91:5008:4B2E:3157:720D (talk) 18:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * While it is a server, a plot is played out on it. The difference between this server and 2b2t is that it actually has a (somewhat planned) story. I agree that it is a bit confusingly worded and welcome suggestions as to improving it.
 * 2b2t does have a history section (. It does deal with the history of the server itself (as opposed to a hypothetical plot), but there is little coverage of DSMP's "meta-history". Some of its outside impact is mentioned (e.g., Twitter, Heat Waves, the protest and internet culture with penis SMP), but I cannot add what has not been covered by reliable sources. Are you suggesting that the Cultural Impact section is to be expanded? If so, I would welcome specific sources or ask you to approach media to write more articles about the server, because all sources on the server I could find are used in the article already.
 * I'm confused by as well as in depth sections on when how and why it was made. and but little about how and when it was created. Do you want more or less about its founding? 15 (talk) 19:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * "2b2t does have a history section (. It does deal with the history of the server itself"
 * Oddly, enough, that's exactly what I pointed out with:
 * "all that's there are notable occurences that reflect the server and the real world, as well as in depth sections on when how and why it was made" 2603:7000:1F00:6B91:5008:4B2E:3157:720D (talk) 19:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Right, I think I understand. The issue is that the sources don't really say much about the history of the DSMP. If you find any, you are free to post them here. As of now, I can only find enough material for the first two sentences of . 15 (talk) 19:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

I think this should be merged with the "Dream (YouTuber)" page Liambdonegan01 (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Article Issues
Hello! I encountered this article and had a couple of concerns regarding three aspects of it: notability & relevance, neutrality, and veracity.

Notability & Relevance

I see that somebody else has brought up the notability of Dream SMP prior to my posting, and it seems like since this article is referenced by other articles and has some secondhand sources like the news sites Polygon and Insider, it possibly meets Wikipedia's notability qualifications. I only bring it up to prompt somebody who might be more familiar to cross-reference.

Not necessarily a notability issue (because notability doesn't concern content WITHIN an article, but its subject), I do want to suggest that the section on "Penis SMP" be removed from Cultural Impact, it is not notable and an irrelevant section to have on an article which is already on the fringes of being considered notable. If a section to a Wikipedia article was added every time a joke got popular on a social media platform, Wikipedia would become unusable within a month.

In addition to this, the "Heat Waves" fanfiction is not notable or relevant either, citation #14 only mentions Dream SMP and the fanfiction's role in the Glass Animals song being voted #1 on Australia's Triple J Hottest 100 countdown for 2020 in passing, and citation #15 is not secondhand, it's a source from Triple J. These aren't proper citations and this particular event isn't really notable or relevant otherwise.

I'm not against a page like this existing, it's received enough attention from secondhand sources to qualify, but some parts of this article are just not relevant or really notable to warrant being included here.

Neutrality

Probably the article's biggest problem. It really reads like it was written by a fan, or is some kind of review of the Dream SMP thing. It's strange to me nobody's brought this up, that it reads as biased or like an advertisement.

The article seems to focus heavily on the glowing reviews of Dream SMP given by outlets like Wired and Polygon, while only discussing the negative attention Dream SMP and its fans have received with a sentence at most. I've said before, I'm not against having a Dream SMP page on Wikipedia, but I think this page needs to be held to the same high standards that other pages about Internet/pop culture phenomena are.

Veracity

Kind of related to the above, but the lack of neutrality does raise a few questions about the citation's accuracy. I'm not entirely familiar with Dream SMP, so I'd invite people who know more about it to weigh in on the accuracy of the claims in this article, however I think that since the source for citation #16 doesn't even mention Dream, it should probably be taken off.

I hope that these concerns will be considered and this page's issues can be resolved!

JGMasterson (talk) 01:03, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for voicing your concerns.
 * RE N&R: I agree that the Penis SMP is a bit too prominently featured. The reason that it has its own section is for the Penis SMP to have a proper target, but I can substitute it with an anchor if needed. The part on it can also be shortened, but not removed, as an entire Polygon article makes it due for inclusion.
 * Can you help me understand why Triple J is not a secondary source for the role of Heat Waves in promoting Glass Animals? Sure, it's their ranking but they are secondary for the popularity of the song and fan fiction. Heat Waves also has a paragraph in the Polygon piece on Penis SMP and almost the entirety of dedicated to it.
 * RE Neutrality: Articles should reflect what sources have to say about the subject. If they tend to be more positive, than that fact is reflected in the article. Articles don't need to give equal attention to positives and negatives for them to be neutral, see WP:FALSEBALANCE for an explanation. If there is criticism which has been covered by reliable sources, feel free to add it to the article.
 * RE Veracity: I have removed the citation and part in question. 15 (talk) 08:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your input, I appreciate a second opinion on this. I'd advocate the section be shortened as well.


 * On the topic of the Triple J piece, I can see that angle of it. I suppose I initially saw the citation as being primary/self-referential, but I think I could agree on it being secondary in regards to Dream SMP.


 * On neutrality, fair point. I only brought it up because A. I'm not entirely familiar with Dream SMP and would want some outside input, since it kind of seemed like a fan wrote it, and B. I am not 100% on the neutrality policies of Wikipedia, so thank you for that link on false balance, it was informative,


 * Thanks for your input/help and for taking care of that citation, I appreciate it!


 * JGMasterson (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Fan cruft
This article looks like it was written by a fan. It needs a serious overhaul and discussed from a neutral POV, and it also needs more sources. 2603:7000:1F00:6B91:41D:27B:5729:87EB (talk) 03:41, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Please make specific suggestions and read the rest of this talk page. Also see WP:FALSEBALANCE.  A positive portrayal of a topic is not evidence on an NPOV violation. The article has to reflect the treatment if the topic by the sources. Finding parts of the article silly (you're not the only one) is not a reason to remove said parts. 15 (talk) 10:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)