Talk:Drepanophycus

Merger
I copied relevant material from an article on Drepanophycus spinaeformis, which was then a stub, and left it as a redirect. (There are no other species articles.) The article needs more work, e.g. on the phylogeny of the genus and on at least some of the other species. (There are also issues over the Drepanophycaceae article, which (a) has little material (b) describes a rather out of date taxonomic situation.) Peter coxhead (talk) 14:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * For extinct plants, we generally only have a genus article with brief discussions of the species.
 * There is rarely enough material which is relevant to Wikipedia for a species article on an extinct plant (specialists will read the original literature); this was true of the Drepanophycus spinaeformis article which was labelled a stub.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Drepanophycus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101220180900/http://palaeos.com/Plants/default.htm to http://www.palaeos.com/Plants/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)