Talk:Drew Cooper

Too small category
The category has 2 articles, and by existing is supporting a total of 3 categories. This is truly excessive. There is no reason to have any categories with under 5 articles. Even that is too small really to justify categories unless they are part of a large scheme. The Babson Beavers category itself only has 4 articles. There is no reason to subdivide a 4 article category at all. This whole scheme is a set of small categories that have no good reason to exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Categorization should follow text, not a table
If something does not make enough difference to someone's life that we bother having text about it in the article on the person, we should not have a category on it. If it is so minor that it is buried in a table and not mentioned in the normal text of the article, I do not believe we can say it is defining enough to matter enough to have a category, and we would be best off not categorizing by it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The body of article is clearly underdeveloped. We've been over this before. Assistant coaching tenures are indeed defining. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)