Talk:Drive (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 00:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Will review soon.  Ruby  2010/  2013  00:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Lead: I think production info should stay together (i.e. rearrange it so that the casting info with the writing, directing credits).
 * Brian Craston is wikilinked twice in lead
 * "...investigating possible, and erroneous, domestic terrorism." How is the domestic terrorism erroneous? I assume you mean that there ultimately was no terrorism?
 * No need to wikilink United States, United Kingdom, and Ireland (common words)
 * "The episode received 0.70 million viewers..." An episode does not "receive" viewers ;)
 * "The episode later won an American Society of Cinematographers award for best regular series" -> "Drive" won the award for Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography – Regular Series from the American Society of Cinematographers.
 * Quotation mark problems persist (" versus ')
 * Use consistent ref formatting (5 vs 7 for example)
 * Ref 7 publisher should be New York (also provide wikilink)
 * Unitalicize Critical Myth

I believe that's it. I'll place the review on hold for seven days (though it'd be cool if you get it done by the 28th, (b/c of the Wikicup). Thanks!  Ruby  2010/  2013  01:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, I believe I've fixed all the issues. Thank you for reviewing!--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Pass for GA.  Ruby  2010/  2013  04:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)