Talk:Droga5

Campaigns data move from page on 7 Feb 2012 - move back as considered needed
Notable Campaigns

Lots of text in the history if needed. Ariconte (talk) 01:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

COI note
It would be good if uninvolved editors went through the references and tried to develop some new ones. I have tagged and an admitted employee (User talk:Carly.n.bennett and here) does not agree. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I noticed the request for attention on Wikiproject Business and gave the article a rough trim. Here's my rationale on the article overall:
 * There is too little information about the company's history, which is what is most important to us
 * There are far too many primary sources, instead of secondary sources
 * There was a lot of information about individual executives and staffing, which isn't something we normally include
 * A company's notable works is something we include, but we are careful to be selective about those that are included
 * Awards is something we do include, but we are careful only to include those that are significant.
 * Corporate 14:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Droga5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120713031842/http://www.canneslions.com:80/inspiration/past_grands_prix_advert.cfm?sub_channel_id=299 to http://www.canneslions.com/inspiration/past_grands_prix_advert.cfm?sub_channel_id=299
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121001114625/http://www.canneslions.com/inspiration/videos.cfm?media_id=433 to http://www.canneslions.com/inspiration/videos.cfm?media_id=433&tag=103&pg=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

COI
As noted in the article linked to above, it's rather obvious that is a single purpose account with a conflict of interest here. We desperately need some neutral editors to have a look at this. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)