Talk:Drosera anglica/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.'' This article is being reassessed as part of the GA Sweeps. ✽ Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  16:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * Made minor edits.
 * b (MoS):
 * Minor edits to conform with MOS.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * Reference 6 broken. As the reference was cited only once - and then as a second reference to a fact, I have removed it rather than trying to find a replacement.
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * Reliable sources.
 * c (OR):
 * No evidence of OR
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * Adequate.
 * b (focused)
 * Adequate.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * No POV issues.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass ✽  Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  16:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass ✽  Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  16:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass ✽  Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  16:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)