Talk:Drosera modesta

Stubs
Three stubs just seems excessive when one encompasses it perfectly. Falcon8765 (talk) 16:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I find value in all three. We have plenty of Australian editors who like to expand Australian eudicot stubs or specifically Western Australian stubs. Further, not all Droseraceae are endemic to Western Australia, so category intersections here will help editors identify which stubs they want to focus on expanding. My Australian colleagues had been adding these stub tags to my Australian articles, so I adopted the practice. Oh, and I also disagree with the use of the uppercase defaultsort, especially for flora articles titled at the scientific name. No other articles will found in a category near "Drosera modesta" except other Drosera species that begin with the letter m, so capitalization is moot. It seems entirely unnecessary. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)