Talk:Druridge Bay curlew

To-Do List
These reasons appeared with the failed review but weren't visible for some reason. Here they are:
 * The article does not cite its sources.
 * The lead section should be expanded to summarise more of the article's content.
 * Section headings should be capitalised according to the WP:MOS.
 * The article may be too technical for a general audience to understand. Rufous-crowned Sparrow 19:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Nomination
I've nominated this for GA status. Personally, I think it isn't quite there yet, although it arguably meets all criteria. The lack of images is because, as far as I am aware there are no non-copyrighted photos of the bird. I was a little worried about the section stubs, but Great Barrier Reef has passed as a GA with section stubs, so ... Over to you, independent reviewer. SP-KP 20:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Good Article nomination has failed
The Good article nomination for has failed
 * it is incorrectly formatted - use == on headings to generate a TOC. Also, two sections are marked as stubs.  Any tags which identify deficiencies bar articles from being designated good - I'll delist the barrier reef now.  Images would be really nice but if not available then there's nothing we can do.  Worldtraveller 14:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Druridge Bay curlew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060109180855/http://www.bou.org.uk:80/recnews02.html to http://www.bou.org.uk/recnews02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)