Talk:Dry Bones (comic strip)

Image copyright problem with Image:MediaCoverageArabIsraeliConflict CoercionCensorship DryBones.jpg
The image Image:MediaCoverageArabIsraeliConflict CoercionCensorship DryBones.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --04:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

DryBones Palestine.jpg
what happend to the Palestianian thing? I mean it may have been poorly worded but it's pretty accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.250.210 (talk) 10:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Shildig
The point re the 7.4% NYTimes story? So many parties were Shildig - mistaken, "the story is wrong" - incorrect - not right - get the point? Who would think that a computer guy who made his night time work into Dry Bones (comic strip) would merit even one percent, let alone more than five. Pi314m (talk) 18:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


 * In the comic, the name is written as "Shuldig". How did we get from Shuldig to Shildig? "One of his cartoon characters is Shildig - Yiddish for guilty/to blame. The New York Times had 7.4% about Shildig, Dry Bones and Kirschen..." giggle (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * What does that sentence even mean? 81.225.43.56 (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * As the sentence states, the comic protagonist is named Shuldig. Yet, somehow, the section referenced uses a word spelled "shildig". Are they the same word? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregory.george.lewis (talk • contribs) 11:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

7.4%
How is that line not original research? None of the citation support it and it seems incredibly POV. --FeldBum (talk) 14:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)