Talk:Duane Clarridge

Refimprove
The refimprove tag was added without explanation, and most sections seem generally well sourced. There are exceptions, however. I think it would be more appropriate to add the tag to a specific section or citation needed tags to specific statements. I wanted to give people a chance to object before I removed the template and replaced it with more specific tags. In general, I think specific tags are better because it's easier for other people to quickly fix the problem - which I don't think applies to the entire article. Input? Objections? Alternate suggestions? TheMikeBest (talk) 14:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I also added citations for the two big paragraphs, the quote and the date of death that didn't have them, but again I don't want to remove a tag that was just added. The fact that I don't see the problem doesn't mean there isn't one. TheMikeBest (talk) 14:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Now irrelevant, tag was removed by the user that first added it. TheMikeBest (talk) 16:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Duane Clarridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110321003426/http://www.salon.com:80/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/03/17/clarridge/index.html to http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/03/17/clarridge/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:55, 17 December 2016 (UTC)