Talk:Dubăsari Dam

Merge proposal
As both articles are stubs, I propose to merge them under the name Dubăsari Dam. Beagel (talk) 18:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Oppose There is nothing wrong with having stub articles. It would be better to have them as separate articles. Ng.j (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * While there is nothing wrong with having stub articles, these articles are interreletated and at the moment merger will give just better and more complex overview of this topic. It is always possible to split the common article info separate article if there is more information about both issues. Beagel (talk) 13:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:23, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Dubăsari hydroelectric power plant → Dubăsari Dam – The usual practice is to name articles about the hydroelectric complexes after the dam (particularly if the dam and hydrostation have the same name). Beagel (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment when you merged the articles, you could have just merged it to the new location, and pointed both old articles there, instead of renaming one of the two pages. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.