Talk:Dublin Unified School District

Deletion?

 * The article is currently a catastrophe. I have laden it with tags, each of which is fully justified. At present, I am seriously considering nominating this article for deletion, as it fails WP:GNG and has been penned largely by SPA's with possibly undeclared conflicts of interest. It reads like an advert, and is a frankly atrocious article in its current state, at least in my view. I think it may be irredeemable, but am willing to see how others feel before proceeding to WP:AfD. Stormy clouds (talk) 23:38, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree, though a search of Google news turns up some regional coverage. The article would definitely need an overhaul if it's kept. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with Jmertel23, I think there is enough notability to justify the article's existence at all but most of the sections contain no notable information (or no information at all). I will remove the empty section for now. Mehaveaccount (talk) 17:56, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

More of an Advertisement

 * This article was clearly made by someone from the DUSD, may it be a student or a staff member. It also was clearly made to advertise the District, as no information was given except a list of all the schools, its mission statement, its programs, and its awards which I believe are not as necessary and don't they need an entire paragraph to list all of them especially the unimportant ones. Also the following statment, "The District was recognized by Niche as one of the 2018 Best School Districts in California." misleading and unnecessary as DUSD was placed #32 on that list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFearlessCheese (talk • contribs) 22:54, 27 July 2018 (UTC)