Talk:Ducie Island/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: – Quadell (talk) 17:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Nominator: User:GDuwen


 * 1a nitpick: "It resembles a long, thin sausage in shape." It doesn't look like a sausage to me, and I don't think that's the most encyclopedic way to put it. How about "Very long and thin, the islet is largely forested..."?


 * 1b suggestion: According to WP:LEAD, the lede should summarize all sections of the article without giving any information not included elsewhere. As such, it does not need citations; instead, the facts can be cited in the body of the article where they are given in detail (as they are). Consider removing citations from the lede.


 * 6b suggestion: Consider captioning the infobox photo "NASA photograph of Ducie Island" instead of "NASA picture of Ducie Island", because it's not immediately obvious it's a photograph.

There's really very little I can find to suggest for improvement. – Quadell (talk) 19:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * All the suggestions are assessed.-- GD uwen    Tell me!   20:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent, well done. – Quadell (talk) 20:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)