Talk:Duga-3 (eastern) receiver

I created this page so Google Maps would show a marker for the eastern Duga-3 receiver in the Wikipedia layer. It only pulls, as far as I know.

I couldn't find any sources listing which facility (transmit/receive) was which in Siberia. I looked at the satellite photos, and the Chernobyl transmitter (we know it was indeed the xmit) has a medium building and a small building, while the receiver has a single large building. The Siberian installation has the same pattern (no surprise; it's the same design). I therefore tagged the Siberian transmitter and receiver coords according to the buildings present at those sites. If anyone has a better reference, please add it. Thanks! —Cxw (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Requested move 28 April 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. There seems to be consensus for a merge, but that can be done outside of the RM process. Consensus is not to move. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 18:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Duga-3 (eastern) receiver → Duga-2 – Talk:Duga_radar Li-sung (talk) 22:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge everything into Duga radar instead. We have four almost identical stub articles with fragmentary information, which only work when read within the context of the whole system, and a redundant navbox Soviet OTH radar locations to boot. I can barely follow what is where upon reading linked articles (Duga-1 and Duga-2 is particularly puzzling – is that a duplicate?). No such user (talk) 08:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose move, support merge. Andrewa (talk) 04:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.