Talk:Dulce of León

Request Move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page not moved per discussion. In her sister's case, the extra precision is there to distinguish Sancha, heiress of León from another Sancha of León. In this case there is no conflict to avoid via disambiguation. - GTBacchus(talk) 00:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Dulce of León → Dulce, Heiress of León — More precise title and to match her sister's article. Her entire notability was as heiress of Leon with her sister. There is no question on her and her sister's status as heiress. They were recognized by their father and possibly Portugal and the fraction of the Leonese nobility opposed to union with Castile. Her brother Ferdinand had renounced his right to the Leonese throne in 1218 and had to buy their right from both his sisters in order to become king.--Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy (talk) 07:18, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Its present title is fine the way it is.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose. We do not need to say that she was an heiress in the title. Lots of people are heiresses. Srnec (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

De jure queen?
Can it be made clearer which historians describe Dulce and Sancha as de jure queens of León? I am having trouble verifying this. Pinging Alexcoldcasefan. Surtsicna (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)