Talk:Dunder Mifflin/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dunder Mifflin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * This is done. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * This is done now too. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * This is done now too. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This is done now too. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Gary King ( talk ) 18:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Several references are still missing a publisher.
 * "The actual DMI ticker symbol" reference should also use cite web, but you can keep the text preceding the URL.
 * All done now. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Gary King ( talk ) 17:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * "on June 4, 2008., the intranet.}}" — an extra }} there?
 * References 1 and 14 are missing publishers.


 * Gary King ( talk ) 05:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Passing. Gary King ( talk ) 21:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)