Talk:Dunes (stamps)

Title-move needed
... But I am indisposed from being the editor who fixes it. There are contexts where most words in titles should be up-cased “in depth” (as was improperly done for this talk page and its article, but even so, we should have, somewhere, clear enumeration of them. This talk page section would be an appropriate place for a very specific link to some (notional) policy page justifying a colleague’s decision to capitalize a common noun in a section title, and  I think my nearly two decades of editing, and my contribs as the admin Jerzy for abt 1.5 decades should justify the reliance on my experience and associated intuition I rely on, in at least moving forward with rectification of what I take to be bad guesses, arising from experiences with non-wiki texts and not from WP guidelines, but reckless speculation,. --2601:199:C201:FD70:C11D:B304:E6F1:3439 (talk) 05:43, 23 August 2020 & 07:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, maybe i am wrong in in believing Dunes (Stamps) is simply an ignorantly misnamed article, and i admit to being surprised to see that being linked here from Finbar Kenny. We in any case should at least redirect   Dunes (stamps) and  Dunes Stamps) to the accompanying page, and even if i am somehow wrong in saying it is implausible that a reasonable argument can be offered for  Dunes (Stamps) --- without my having to refute someone's lame excuse for that existing article-title, at the very least, a blue link Dunes (stamps) should  stand in the wings for the benefit of more sensible readers. --ex-Jerzy (ret'd admin), ex-JerzyA (lost-password non-admin), 2601:199:C201:FD70:143D:321B:6A89:80D8 (talk) 07:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)